The Cortina MK2 GT (among others) rear brake shoe size is 228 x 45mm and so are the Sprint's, they are apparently the same shoe, I was expecting there to be a difference. I doubt the Ford has a better front to rear weight balance, so maybe bigger swept area on the front brakes I thought, but no, they used the same pads. Cortina is lighter at 875kg to the Sprint's 991kg, at 4.267m the Cortina is 15cm longer but the wheelbase only 4cm more. Fully dressed 1600 Crossflow weighs 110kg 'ish and the Sprint estimated at 150kg 'ish so definitely more weight up front. Rear wheel cylinder 7/8" (22.22mm) bore on the Cortina is quite a bit bigger than either the 5/8" (15.8mm) or 3/4" (19.05mm) which may or may not be fitted to a Sprint. So lower nose weight and larger rear wheel cylinders is the reason for the LSV, which after all that is what Trackerjack said but with less words, interesting to look up though!
My dad always sneered at Ford's as being cheap and cheerful tin cans with a particular haughtiness about the sound of their starter motors for some reason. And though the list of previous cars started with an Austin Ruby then a Peugeot 203 which he loved but apparently did him no favours with the ladies so he bought a Norton Commander, got married and got an Austin A60, followed by a Triumph 2500 PI, by which time he had changed his mind about Fords clearly and got a new MK3 Fiesta with his mobility allowance money, but I digress.
_________________ Current fleet: '75 Sprint, '73 1850, Daihatsu Fourtrak, Honda CG125, Yamaha Fazer 600, Shetland 570 (yes it's a boat!)
Past fleet: Triumph 2000, Lancia Beta Coupe, BL Mini Clubman, Austin Metro, Vauxhall Cavalier MK1 & MK2, Renault 18 D, Rover 216 GSI, Honda Accord (most expensive car purchase, hated, made out of magnetic metal as only car I've ever been crashed into...4 times), BMW 318, Golf GTi MK3 16v x 3
|