Page 1 of 1

I still don't know....

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:15 am
by tinweevil
... when VA41 is going to arrive :-(<br>
<br>
Anyhow, Alun pointed out a while back that it has the wrong bumpers, are these the correct <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Dolomite-Front-Bu ... <!--EZCODE LINK END--> and <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Dolomite-Rear-Bum ... <!--EZCODE LINK END--> ones? Here's a link to the <!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... <!--EZCODE LINK END--><br>
<br>
Tinweevil

<p>1978 Dolomite Sprint<br>
1968 GT6 II<br>
1972 Spitfire IV<br>
</p><i></i>

Re: I still don't know....

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 5:53 pm
by SprintV8
What's that bar runing from the inner turret to engine 4.<br>
<br>
Long single lamp early type.<br>
Twin small lamp's Late type.<br>
<br>
Not sure on the front bumper.

<p>1980 Dolomite Sprint V8<br>
1997 Vauxhall Calibra 2.0 16v SE8<br>
2003 Suzuki GSX1300R (The Yamaha R1 is indicating 190mph When the Busa flies past)<br>
This space is available for advertising, contact user for rates.</p><i></i>

Re: I still don't know....

Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2005 10:56 pm
by tinweevil
Dunno, looks like someones bodged a 2nd stabiliser of some kind. I've already sourced a rocker cover, the hole in the turret shouldn't be too great a problem.<br>
<br>
Tinweevil

<p>1978 Dolomite Sprint<br>
1968 GT6 II<br>
1972 Spitfire IV<br>
</p><i></i>

So why isnt the hazard switch the square type

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:46 am
by willow48
I thought all early dollies had a square rocker type hazard switch? Is this true or has it just been changed over the years?<br>


<p></p><i></i>

Re: So why isnt the hazard switch the square type

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 12:21 pm
by MaddMart
Yes, that's the later dash as it also has the HRW switch mounted on it.<br>
<br>
Martin

<p><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.dolomitesprint.com/" target="top">www.dolomitesprint.com</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--></p><i></i>

That was...

Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2005 9:40 pm
by alun n
...one of the reasons why I originally said a reshell was irrelevant as its obviously already been done once!

<p></p><i></i>