The Triumph Dolomite Club - Discussion Forum

Hi, does anybody have any experience / feedback on using the Superflex bush 0868KSS rather than the original bearing 216903 inserted into the lower wishbone UKC1698 ?
Thanks, Richard

I've had this very bush fitted on my 1850 without any issues. The late great Jon Tilson would've disagreed but as far as I'm concerned, the SuperFlex part is a direct replacement.

_________________
Toledo Man

West Yorkshire Area Organiser & forum moderator
Meetings take place on the first Wednesday of the month at 8.00pm at The Old Brickworks, Wakefield Road, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1EA

1972 Dolomite 1850 auto (NYE 751L - Now for sale)
2003 Volvo XC90 D5 SE (PX53 OVZ - The daily driver)
2009 Mercedes-Benz W204 C200 CDI Sport (BJ58 NCV - The 2nd car)
1991 Toyota Celica GT (J481 ONB - another project car)
Former stable of SAY 414M (1974 Toledo), GRH 244D (1966 1300fwd), CDB 324L (1973 1500fwd), GGN 573J (1971 1500fwd), DCP 625S (1977 Dolomite 1300) & LCG 367N (1975 Dolomite Sprint) plus 5 Acclaims and that's just the Triumphs!

Check my blog at http://triumphtoledo.blogspot.com
My YouTube Channel with a bit of Dolomite content.

"There is only one way to avoid criticsm: Do nothing, say nothing and BE nothing." Aristotle

I will attach a photograph which shows the difference.

I would stick with the original design if it is still available.

If you decide to fit the poly type I have found it is very difficult to push the old original type bush out. The trick is to use a relatively small drill to drill out as much of the original rubber as possible before you attempt to push it out.

A correction it was training arm bushes that caused me a problem when it can to getting the old ones out. Luckily I was told about drilling them out by the local Triumph 2000 group.

There should, in theory, be no difference in performance between the 2 designs and indeed the Toledo uses (if still in original fitment) a bush and sleeve arrangement almost identical to the poly version. Chris Witor sells a poly version of this specifically FOR the Toledo.

But I have to say that I have, of necessity, replaced lots of worn out Toledo inner bushes (more recently with Poly) over the years whereas the rosejoint style bush fitted to Dolomites seems virtually indestructible, i've changed only a handful in almost 50 years. And then, usually, the dust shields will have been left out or disintegrated from corrosion. I'm not saying the Poly conversion will disintegrate at the same rate and i've not been using Poly Toledo bushes long enough for a fair test. It's more of an observation!

So my advice is, as usual, if it aint broke, don't fix it! If your original type bushes don't display play or perishing leave them alone.

In common with a lot of folk on here, i'm not in favour of indiscriminate total replacement of all bushing with Poly, just "because I CAN" preferring to cherry pick the most important and frequent wear bushes and leave the rest in stock rubber to maintain some compliance in the ride. This particular bush is right at the bottom of the list of bushes i'd replace with Poly, both in terms of need AND difficulty of the job! I'd rather seek out a NOS lower arm!

As an aside, the dust shield for the Dolomite arm is NLA, but a credible replacement can be adapted from the similar items in a Triumph Herald/Spitfire lower trunnion bush kit.

Steve

_________________
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.