The Triumph Dolomite Club - Discussion Forum

The Number One Club for owners of Triumph's range of small saloons from the 1960s and 1970s.
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 11:24 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Propshaft angles
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 8:54 am 
Offline
TDC Member

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 7:26 am
Posts: 2473
Having had a disaster almost a year ago in my Spitfire because of excessive prop angles, I am now approaching the refit of my engine/box and prop in a few days.
I have ordered one of the volvo gearbox mounts as the current one is very wobbly. I read how Galileo did his (good article) but I am unsure if my engine is at the normal height.
So how much of an angle should the front section of the prop be at? (ideally compared the gearbox centreline)
Guidance very welcome!

_________________
Clive Senior
Brighton


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Propshaft angles
PostPosted: Thu Jan 16, 2020 10:29 pm 
Offline
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Posts: 7014
Location: Highley, Shropshire
Quote:
Having had a disaster almost a year ago in my Spitfire because of excessive prop angles, I am now approaching the refit of my engine/box and prop in a few days.
I have ordered one of the volvo gearbox mounts as the current one is very wobbly. I read how Galileo did his (good article) but I am unsure if my engine is at the normal height.
So how much of an angle should the front section of the prop be at? (ideally compared the gearbox centreline)
Guidance very welcome!
There doesn't seem to be a maximum prop angle, nor can you actually ACHIEVE much of an angle without the engine sticking up through the bonnet! I don't know how far out your Spit angle was, but i'd have thought you'd need at least 15 degrees to do it harm. With the confines of the engine bay, I imagine you'd struggle to get as much as 5 degrees. So IMO, it's a non issue!

From what i've learned, the thing to avoid at all costs, is a ZERO angle between the the prop and 3rd motion shaft/O/D output shaft. This has been known to introduce vibration and unwanted sympathetic resonances in the driveline as well as shortening UJ life because it's always running in exactly the same line.

I'm not knocking Galileo, far from it, but I have fitted a good half dozen Volvo mounts now and have not bothered with a 6mm spacer nor have I had any problems! If it looks like you are close to the dreaded zero angle, use the Sprint method of mounting the centre bearing with one lug of the bearing housing BELOW the body mounted support bracket.

When I built the Carledo, I used the Vauxhall sourced front coupling, which resembles a small Rotoflex unit. After i'd done all the work fitting the engine and gearbox and supplied the prop and front section of the Carlton prop for my man at Proptech to assemble and balance, when he handed it back to me, he commented that THIS sort of coupling should run the shaft at no MORE than 1 degree out from the gearbox/crank line. NOW HE TELLS ME! So I took it home and fitted it with some trepidation, but it LOOKED pretty close so I went with it! Either i'm very lucky or VERY VERY good, cos it's still there 8 years and countless storming starts later! And though I have 2 spare couplings, so far i've not needed one!

Steve

_________________
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Propshaft angles
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 9:28 am 
Offline
TDC Member

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 7:26 am
Posts: 2473
Quote:
Quote:
Having had a disaster almost a year ago in my Spitfire because of excessive prop angles, I am now approaching the refit of my engine/box and prop in a few days.
I have ordered one of the volvo gearbox mounts as the current one is very wobbly. I read how Galileo did his (good article) but I am unsure if my engine is at the normal height.
So how much of an angle should the front section of the prop be at? (ideally compared the gearbox centreline)
Guidance very welcome!
There doesn't seem to be a maximum prop angle, nor can you actually ACHIEVE much of an angle without the engine sticking up through the bonnet! I don't know how far out your Spit angle was, but i'd have thought you'd need at least 15 degrees to do it harm. With the confines of the engine bay, I imagine you'd struggle to get as much as 5 degrees. So IMO, it's a non issue!

From what i've learned, the thing to avoid at all costs, is a ZERO angle between the the prop and 3rd motion shaft/O/D output shaft. This has been known to introduce vibration and unwanted sympathetic resonances in the driveline as well as shortening UJ life because it's always running in exactly the same line.

I'm not knocking Galileo, far from it, but I have fitted a good half dozen Volvo mounts now and have not bothered with a 6mm spacer nor have I had any problems! If it looks like you are close to the dreaded zero angle, use the Sprint method of mounting the centre bearing with one lug of the bearing housing BELOW the body mounted support bracket.

When I built the Carledo, I used the Vauxhall sourced front coupling, which resembles a small Rotoflex unit. After i'd done all the work fitting the engine and gearbox and supplied the prop and front section of the Carlton prop for my man at Proptech to assemble and balance, when he handed it back to me, he commented that THIS sort of coupling should run the shaft at no MORE than 1 degree out from the gearbox/crank line. NOW HE TELLS ME! So I took it home and fitted it with some trepidation, but it LOOKED pretty close so I went with it! Either i'm very lucky or VERY VERY good, cos it's still there 8 years and countless storming starts later! And though I have 2 spare couplings, so far i've not needed one!

Steve
Spit had the grarbox and diff parallel (OK within 0.2degrees) but the uj angle was about 7 degrees.
Anything over 3 degrees is unacceptable accoprding to all the UJ manufactureres, if you intend to use anything more than low revs.

took 2 days effort to lower the gearbox, alter the exhaust and adjust the diff/reset suspension. Diff/box angle slightly worse but UJ angle down to 3.2 degrees. So needs to be revisited.

Will avoid zero angle like the plague!

_________________
Clive Senior
Brighton


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Propshaft angles
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 11:13 am 
Offline
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Posts: 7014
Location: Highley, Shropshire
Because the Toledo has a 2 piece prop, the angles are not so critical, or so big as they can be split between the 2 sections.

Considering i've seen many Sprints running quite happily with collapsed engine mounts (oil pump nearly on rack) soggy gearbox mounts and ripped and half destroyed centre bearing rubbers, all of which will have an effect on the gearbox/crank/prop alignment, I would say there is a fair chance of SOME latitude being acceptable, it's not as simple as right or wrong. Lowering the rear suspension will also alter the angles. (and the mean prop length)

Steve

_________________
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.


Top
   
 Post subject: Re: Propshaft angles
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 3:59 pm 
Offline
Future Club member hopefully!
Future Club member hopefully!

Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2019 7:25 pm
Posts: 85
There is a good 25mm of vertical movement either way of ideal tail housing height before it starts to thrum resonantly under light load and if the engine has enough torque wobble the gear lever under load like I experienced with my v8 before i raised the centerbearing to equalize the angles.
As long as the middle and diff UJ measure the same angle and the box uj has a tiny amount it's all good.
Also some tube in tube rubber damped props will naturally thrum at high speed although I dont think any dolomites had those sort.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited