The Triumph Dolomite Club - Discussion Forum

The Number One Club for owners of Triumph's range of small saloons from the 1960s and 1970s.
It is currently Wed Apr 24, 2024 8:43 pm

All times are UTC+01:00




Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:44 pm 
Offline
Future Club member hopefully!
Future Club member hopefully!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 1735
Location: St Annes on Sea, Lancs.
As a consequence of the replacement tank, which came with a sender installed that I didn't want to replace in case it worked, I'm filling the tank a bit at a time to calibrate that replacement sender. As a result of that, I'm going to the nearest garage and using their BP 97 RON rather than the Shell or Tesco 99 RON I normally use.

Anyway, at 10 degrees BTDC static, and an unskimmed head, that's not giving any pinking I can hear.

So, does anybody have an opinion on what lowest RON we can use in relation to advance and skimming?

Graham

_________________
The 16v Slant 4 engine is more fun than the 3.5 V8, because you mostly drive it on the upslope of the torque curve.

Factory 1977 TR7 Sprint FHC VVC 697S (Now all of, but still needs putting together)
B&Y 73 Dolomite Sprint UVB 274M (kids!)
1970 Maroon 13/60 Herald Convertable (wife's fun car).


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 9:31 am 
Offline
TDC Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:20 pm
Posts: 1296
Location: Shetland / here & there
Unskimmed head to my knowledge, but I've always just used super unleaded of whatever variety is available, which is not always, so occasionally a splash and dash of unleaded to somewhere that has, which is always noticeable.

_________________
Current fleet: '75 Sprint, '73 1850, Daihatsu Fourtrak, Honda CG125, Yamaha Fazer 600, Shetland 570 (yes it's a boat!)

Past fleet: Triumph 2000, Lancia Beta Coupe, BL Mini Clubman, Austin Metro, Vauxhall Cavalier MK1 & MK2, Renault 18 D, Rover 216 GSI, Honda Accord (most expensive car purchase, hated, made out of magnetic metal as only car I've ever been crashed into...4 times), BMW 318, Golf GTi MK3 16v x 3


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:49 am 
Offline
Future Club member hopefully!
Future Club member hopefully!

Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:04 pm
Posts: 1549
I suspect the reason you're not getting many replies is because most are simply experimenting and setting the timing for what works for them.

Old four stars, which is a bit before my time, apparently had an octane rating of 98, which means you do need super unleaded for a Sprint. Personally I would am going to retard the ignition so I can get away with using the cheaper stuff.

However if maximum performance is what you want, buy the highest octane fuel you can find and set your car up to run on that. That is the beauty of older cars, it is really up to you how you set it up.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Sep 19, 2020 11:26 pm 
Offline
TDC Member

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 188
I use only Shell, or Tesco super unleaded if I can.
I have the timing at 8 degrees static.
Brand new unskimmed head fitted in 2008.
Car runs well, is quick, pulls cleanly, and ticks over nice-on points.
It will run exactly the same on 95 unleaded-but runs on all the time, and a touch hotter as well.
I suspect as the Sprint motor was designed in very early 70s,its actually designed to run on 5 star rather than 4?


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2020 9:10 am 
Offline
Future Club member hopefully!
Future Club member hopefully!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 1735
Location: St Annes on Sea, Lancs.
Quote:
I suspect as the Sprint motor was designed in very early 70s,its actually designed to run on 5 star rather than 4?
The conversion of the slant-4 to 2Ltr 16-valve config. was designed around 1970 by Coventry Climax (Harry Mundy), under the oversight of Charles Spencer King for the Specialist Division of BLMC. That was specifically so they could take the Dolomite racing in Group-1 (Series-Production Touring Cars), which needed 5000 in a year to qualify. Group-1 homologation only allowed/demanded modifications from the production spec. for safety.

So I reckon it was designed with little regard to what was sold in pumps, but only to what was available in the pit lane for group-1 use, and timing on the race cars set to whatever that would allow. That, careful assembly, blueprinting, and a bit of engineering to spec. limits, etc., presumably, accounts for how they got well over 150bhp on HS6s and a standard spec. cam and pistons. I believe there's a figure of 175 quoted somewhere, but I can't find it at the moment.

As I understand it, the Group-2 use (Touring Cars with "modifications aimed at making them better suited to competition"), which allowed different carbs, inlet and exhaust manifolds, and other mods from production spec, came later. I understand there were a couple of external firms developing the Group-2 (and Group-4 TR7) engines, and they gave around 250 bhp. That's stunningly close to what Costain-Duckworth's twin cam BDG engine gave, which was developed from the Kent, presumably on a much bigger budget (alloy block and such). But, as I understand it, Ford/Cosworth never made enough to gain Group-1 approval - the RS1800 was a Group-2 car, but re-homologated into Group-4 in 1977 as the 2ltr Escort RS, because of the changes the FIA made to the rules in Dec. 1975, with Appendix J to the International Sporting Code for 1976. That was mostly dropping the 100-off rule that had got some Group-2 modification approved on 100 kits of spares made available to buy, not production of homologation specials like the TR7 Sprints of 1977.

Graham

_________________
The 16v Slant 4 engine is more fun than the 3.5 V8, because you mostly drive it on the upslope of the torque curve.

Factory 1977 TR7 Sprint FHC VVC 697S (Now all of, but still needs putting together)
B&Y 73 Dolomite Sprint UVB 274M (kids!)
1970 Maroon 13/60 Herald Convertable (wife's fun car).


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:07 pm 
Offline
TDC Member

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:54 pm
Posts: 188
When you start messing about with octane rating it affects a lot more than timing. If you are running proper race fuel, or military spec Avgas(also used in stunt planes),you are looking at around the 130 octane mark, normal Avgas that I use in the race bike is around 105.


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:28 pm 
Offline
Future Club member hopefully!
Future Club member hopefully!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 1735
Location: St Annes on Sea, Lancs.
Quote:
When you start messing about with octane rating it affects a lot more than timing. If you are running proper race fuel, or military spec Avgas(also used in stunt planes),you are looking at around the 130 octane mark, normal Avgas that I use in the race bike is around 105.
I don't think the FIA let Group-1 cars run on special fuels, even in 1974. But it probably could be the best premium petrol you might get at the pumps. Whereas the road cars would have to allow for the variations and opportunities for additional profits in a commercial distribution system without too much risk of the engine being killed.

Graham

_________________
The 16v Slant 4 engine is more fun than the 3.5 V8, because you mostly drive it on the upslope of the torque curve.

Factory 1977 TR7 Sprint FHC VVC 697S (Now all of, but still needs putting together)
B&Y 73 Dolomite Sprint UVB 274M (kids!)
1970 Maroon 13/60 Herald Convertable (wife's fun car).


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC+01:00


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Trendiction and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited