Page 96 of 136
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 10:18 pm
by 2Toledos
tinweevil wrote:My PC is 2 months old so no blaming the OS please.
Even though it's running Windows for Workgroups
Sorry; Couldn't resist..... and; as I may as well get hung for a sheep, as a lamb:
Acrobat is the biggest pile of 'bloat-ware' there is; always has been - 150MB for a document
reader ?.... Please

Re: Off Topic
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 7:34 am
by tinweevil
2Toledos wrote:Acrobat is the biggest pile of 'bloat-ware' there is; always has been - 150MB for a document
reader ?.... Please

Couldn't agree more. The document compare function is the main reason I have pro, from time to time I install the trial versions of the alternatives and do a bunch of compares to see whose gives the best result. So far it's always been Adobe but I'd only ever describe it as 'least poor of the options'. In rev X they've tweaked the doc compare, first time since 7 iirc. Yipee I thought, lets see how much it's progressed. From what I've seen so far they've added a load of eye candy, taken away a couple of useful features and done absolutely diddly to improve the quality of the compare results.

Re: Off Topic
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 8:22 am
by james_r_lucas
tinweevil wrote:2Toledos wrote:Acrobat is the biggest pile of 'bloat-ware' there is; always has been - 150MB for a document
reader ?.... Please

Couldn't agree more. The document compare function is the main reason I have pro, from time to time I install the trial versions of the alternatives and do a bunch of compares to see whose gives the best result. So far it's always been Adobe but I'd only ever describe it as 'least poor of the options'. In rev X they've tweaked the doc compare, first time since 7 iirc. Yipee I thought, lets see how much it's progressed. From what I've seen so far they've added a load of eye candy, taken away a couple of useful features and done absolutely diddly to improve the quality of the compare results.

I ditched adobe Reader ages ago... I can't remember the alternative I used, but it's much faster to load, and takes up a lot less space. The main reason for switching was the load time! I'll have a look when I get home.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:15 am
by Nick C
Foul on the part of the last three posters!
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:42 am
by Spunkymonkey
Nick C wrote:Foul on the part of the last three posters!
[adjudication mode]Agreed. Guilty as charged and sentenced to post:
"I wish all software was as good as Adobe"
before using the thread again

[/adjudication mode]
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:24 am
by marty dolomite
Just because I have a mobile phone which keeps me in touch with the world 24/7 it doesnt mean I actually want to talk to you, just because we work for the same company you are not a 'mate' mate, if I saw you in a pub would I socialise with you? NO

Re: Off Topic
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:58 pm
by Pauldaf44
Chocolate cake and chips
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:59 pm
by marty dolomite
Another Dolomite shaped car left my yard today and another possibly going this weekend so that leaves 5 Dolomite sized spaces that need filling.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:14 am
by Oli_88
I have accidentally acquired a bass guitar, right when I was giving up musical instruments. Oh dear.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:50 pm
by marty dolomite
Auto jumble bargain, Dolomite top ball joint (QH) £5, followed by another QH top BJ for only £5 and a 1970s still sealed in box 12v hair dryer for £3
(I wont mention that a steak pasty cost me £3.85 and a cuppa tea £1.30

)
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:35 pm
by Purplebargeken
Just where do car keys disappear to in this house?
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:38 pm
by Purplebargeken
Found 'em when I pulled down the sunvisor in the Amica. Keys hurt when the hit you on the head.
Now I'ff jusht bitten my bottom lip. Arrgghhh!
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:49 pm
by Spunkymonkey
3 days to Boris......
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:01 pm
by Oli_88
Ordering hoses would be much easier if I could remember what sizes I need longer than ten minutes.
Re: Off Topic
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 6:05 pm
by marty dolomite
The following is on topic for future reference so other dont make the same mistake....................
Oli_88 wrote:Ordering hoses would be much easier if I could remember what sizes I need longer than ten minutes.
That is were you are going wrong Oli, hoses sizes are in CM or inches not minutes
