The Triumph Dolomite Club - Discussion Forum

Easy to make repair panels for no curves

Now I'm with Jod Clark on this one. The Henson is way short of the ugliest car ever, and the build quality is (was?) surprisingly high for the period. Performance (depending on engine) could also be impressive too, but that Audi is simply stonkingly awful. Shame, really, because most Audis aren't bad at all. Perhaps someone in the design department spent too long gawking at a Cayenne, cos it runs that a close second.

I don't know what Audi were thinking with their newer cars. The front end just looks like the car has a massive goatee beard! Cars shouldn't have beards.

Neither should people whose heads are the shape of a bag of cat litter or a pineapple, but they don't listen either.

Surprised that nobody yet mentioned the Nissan Qwoob, Cashcow or.......

...this munter of a thing which apparently failed the Elk test and will fall over and die if you rag it through a corner. Good:



Jeez, what a moose, but not as good at reversing around corners as one.

i cant believe the first gen doblo or multiplas haven't been mentioned. Surely Ugly was a word invented to describe them

Only that isn't strictly speaking a "first generation" Multipla, is it?
This is:

and that, IMHO, is a thing of great beauty and shouldn't be in this thread.
Though it does appear to have a beard thing happening.......

Saw one of these for the first time today Why? Surely only someone with eyesight so bad they wouldn't be allowed to drive would by one. I had to go home and wash my eyes

Nissan Juke? Only one letter out!!! I wonder what Renault will call their version?

That puts the UG in UGLY!!

scoobyh123 wrote:I wonder what Renault will call their version

Franck Ribery, after the famous footballist who can't drive a bus?


Now either he failed the elk test too, or his mère was impregnated by one.

Still think the "Whitby Warrior " wins the title

So that's what a Whitby Warrior looks like!! Searched but couldn't find one!! In it's defence, it's allowed to be a bit ugly as it's a utility vehicle. Take into account the other cars nominated - they're meant to be state of the art things of beauty that you're proud to have!
The Whitby offering could be tarted up quite nicely i reckon into something approaching the lines of a Land Rover, which despite being boxy, the Landy has always had a certain good look about it IMHO.

You guys have found some ugly cars and thats a fact, especially that Nissan thing but the Henson is still butt ugly IMHO.

Glenn, I agree, that Whitby Warrior is fuglyish , but that's the Vauxhall-based version. The original, mini-based versions weren't too bad and drove quite well, I used to look after one for a Subaru owner who hadn't the bottle to bring it to the workshops, so I serviced, repaired and generally kept on gluing it back together for him after hours! This did mean that I sometimes had to be seen in the thing, but the perspex side windows (sliding ones) were so scratched that I don't think I was ever recognised.

Here's one:

ARRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!!!!

MY EYES

THEY ARE BURNING !!!!!!!

Ladies and gentleman we can now settle this once and for all. The ugliest car ever is the Ssang Yong Rodius

I've deliberatly not posted a picture because I don't want to upset anyone, you'll have to look it up for yourself although I'd advise against it. My eyes needed a boil wash