Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.
Message
Author
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13569
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#31 Post by xvivalve »

With regard the Jag tensioner it is early XJ6, but you may encounter the same issue we have in that when you ask for the part by number or name you will be supplied with an aftermarket version with the same poor quality construction. There are Jag specialists who stock the OE part, but they'll charge you handsomely for it, in some instances £50+

I currently have a couple of OE Jag ones by me that I will happily pass to members at cost, ie £31.20
Jon Tilson
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 11179
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Middlesex

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#32 Post by Jon Tilson »

I would say in Polly's list that items 1 and 3 warrant further investigation and item 2
is the Roland one that is to be avoided in Sprint applications.

I may well write to the supplier to ask his views on its use in Jags...

Jonners
Note from Admin: sadly Jon passed away in February 2018 but his humour and wealth of knowledge will be fondly remembered by all. RIP Jonners.
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13569
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#33 Post by xvivalve »

Roland? You mean Rolon?

I didn't see Polly's post before my previous one, odd, as it was posted 10 minutes before.

At those prices, I suspect from my investigations through the trade, that even naming the part or giving the number you will end up with a copy version. This is only one example where we are victims of parts buyers' desire for maximum profit.
User avatar
SprintMWU773V
TDC Staffs Area Organiser
Posts: 5429
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: The Old Asylum

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#34 Post by SprintMWU773V »

I thought I'd check my stock.

I have a Jaguar one (Renold). This one has a small hole on the body and no hole on the slipper pad.

Image

The one fitted to my car and removed was a Renold with no locating dowel and no visible hole on the slipper pad. It must have done some mileage before I stripped the engine down with no issues.

Image

I also purchased another Renold one a year or so ago, again a Jaguar one. This one has a locating dowel and the slipper pad also has a small hole in it. This seems closest to the original Dolomite type one?

Image

I have a Rolon one too but s the consensus is that these are s##t I didn't bother to look.
Mark

1961 Chevrolet Corvair Greenbrier Sportswagon
1980 Dolomite Sprint project using brand new shell
2009 Mazda MX5 2.0 Sport
2018 Infiniti Q30
User avatar
PaulB
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 383
Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 6:11 pm

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#35 Post by PaulB »

Have a look at the side of the piston under the slipper pad head. On the ones without the hole in the slipper pad, you should find a very small hole. I suspect this has two purposes. It provides an bleed for the oil feed preventing air locks and also an oil supply to the chain.
dursley92
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:39 am

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#36 Post by dursley92 »

Just out of curiosity I ordered the EAC3629 one from BritshParts and this is what came, they show the part number as supeceded. Its flat on the back with no dowell:-

Image

Doesn't look too bad though and its says Made in France on the box. Do we believe it?

Image

And just to muddy the waters further how does the Austin Healey part no.011-139 and the MG part 12H3292 compare?
I just ordered an MG one from Leacy MG total cost including post of £13.20, we will see what turns up. They also list a very cheap repro one.

Image

------------------
Update: Leacy Classics 12H3292 just arrived.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Last edited by dursley92 on Sat Feb 28, 2015 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Russ Cooper
Dursley
UK
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1935
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#37 Post by James467 »

Here you go, this is an original 12H3292 it has a dowel and hole in the slipper pad.

Image

Image

James
Jon Tilson
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 11179
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Middlesex

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#38 Post by Jon Tilson »

The other crucial thing with these is how does the ratchet and spring bit work.
e.g. if the internal peg breaks off on the ratchet bit then the tensioner will go loose with no oil pressure.....

Jonners
Note from Admin: sadly Jon passed away in February 2018 but his humour and wealth of knowledge will be fondly remembered by all. RIP Jonners.
User avatar
trackerjack
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 4727
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:33 pm
Location: hampshire

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#39 Post by trackerjack »

Jon Tilson wrote:The other crucial thing with these is how does the ratchet and spring bit work.
e.g. if the internal peg breaks off on the ratchet bit then the tensioner will go loose with no oil pressure.....

Jonners

Surely not ...............its not hydraulic, is it? :lol:
track action maniac.

The lunatic is out................heres Jonny!
Jon Tilson
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 11179
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Middlesex

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#40 Post by Jon Tilson »

Lol....

The conclusion was that it was partially hydraulic I think, or should be....and the ratchett stops it rewinding
as you your good self pointed out....and convinced us.

Jonners
Note from Admin: sadly Jon passed away in February 2018 but his humour and wealth of knowledge will be fondly remembered by all. RIP Jonners.
User avatar
Mad Mart
TDC Member
Posts: 8529
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: Winscombe, North Somerset, England
Contact:

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#41 Post by Mad Mart »

Jon Tilson wrote:Lol....

The conclusion was that it was partially hydraulic I think, or should be....and the ratchett stops it rewinding
as you your good self pointed out....and convinced us.

Jonners
Image
Sprintless for the first time in 35+ years. :boggle2: ... Still Sprintless.

Engines, Gearboxes, Overdrives etc. rebuilt. PM me.


2012 Porsche Boxster 981 S


Image
User avatar
soe8m
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:13 am
Location: The continent

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#42 Post by soe8m »

Jon Tilson wrote:Lol....

The conclusion was that it was partially hydraulic I think, or should be....

Jonners
I alway's thought this conclusion was your own first step of accepting.

Jeroen
Classic Kabelboom Company. For all your wiring needs. http://www.classickabelboomcompany.com
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13569
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#43 Post by xvivalve »

As I've pointed out in the past, you cannot rely purely on a part number, even with the Jag items, as they too are being superseded with copies.
User avatar
soe8m
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:13 am
Location: The continent

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#44 Post by soe8m »

I know Vin Diesel has some NOS lying around.

Jeroen.
Classic Kabelboom Company. For all your wiring needs. http://www.classickabelboomcompany.com
Jon Tilson
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 11179
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Middlesex

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#45 Post by Jon Tilson »

I'd want a hole in the slipper pad for the oil to lube the chain myself....

Cant be hard to run a drill up it.

Jonners
Note from Admin: sadly Jon passed away in February 2018 but his humour and wealth of knowledge will be fondly remembered by all. RIP Jonners.
Post Reply