Page 1 of 2
Speedo reading half
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 12:40 pm
by HQentity
Heya everyone!
Today I changed the worm drive in the gearbox. The old one was pretty beaten up so it clearly needed it!
The speedo now works, but reads half the correct value which I find a bit baffling to say the least?
The previous owner said to me that the gearbox has been reconditioned during the time he owned her, and I believe the differential and wheels are all standard. The speedo cable was replaced as well.
Gearbox is 3 rail non overdrive.
I couldn't get the screw in that holds the worm drive in place, I'm pretty confident its in far enough, but just not rotated correctly. I simply put the screw up tight against the worm drive instead of into it.
Hi again.......
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 4:09 pm
by sprint95m
Kyle, I think you have answered your question?
When I removed the drive gear, the lock screw's head was flush with the gearbox casing.
So, I am thinking you should undo said lock screw and then wiggle the drive gear back and fore until it drops into position fully
and then you should be able to correctly tighten the lock screw.
What I think is happening is that the drive gear is only part engaging....hence the under reading?
Ian.
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Wed May 20, 2015 6:40 pm
by Howard81
Most new cables aren't greased adequately enough which can cause irrational readings. You can remove the centre spindle from one of the ends, re-grease with low-friction light grease and then reassemble. I think I used bicycle cable grease.
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 8:47 pm
by HQentity
Hiya,
Have done both those things, speed has improved greatly but still about 20% out. Maybe it will improve over time? I know i hasn't been working on at least a year so it might just need some miles to loosen up?
Thanks again

Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Thu May 21, 2015 10:12 pm
by MIG Wielder
It is unlikely to improve over time. Can you check the colour of the nylon gear wheel on the old speedo drive gear and compare it with the new one. ( They are colour coded according to colour ) . Alternatively can you count the number of teeth on the old and new gears as a comparison. What part number does the new gear have ?
Do you have the early type of speedometer installed ( perhaps a photo ? ) and what are the small numbers on the speedo; front face near the 0mph marker ?
Tony.
For your information.....
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 10:17 am
by sprint95m
The drive gear came out of a very early 1850 three rail 'box (sub WF10,000) and the speedo was reading correctly.
If I can find the intermediate 1850 parts book I'll check the part numbers for the drive gears,
but I thought intermediate 1850s had single rail 'boxes?
Ian.
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 10:31 am
by AlanH
Has any grease got into your speedo ?
If you grease the whole cable it can work it's way up into the speedo's guts. Usualy this results in the needle wildly flapping about but it may be worth a look.
Re: For your information.....
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 2:17 pm
by Edin Dundee
sprint95m wrote:The drive gear came out of a very early 1850 three rail 'box (sub WF10,000) and the speedo was reading correctly.
If I can find the intermediate 1850 parts book I'll check the part numbers for the drive gears,
but I thought intermediate 1850s had single rail 'boxes?
Ian.
My Sep 75 intermediate 1850 has single rail.
Okay.....
Posted: Fri May 22, 2015 3:50 pm
by sprint95m
The July 1974 parts catalogue shows all 1850 three rail gearboxes used the same speedo drive gear.
Thanks for confirming what I thought Bill. I guess that Kyle's 1850 must be amongst the last with a 3 rail 'box.
Ian.
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 10:38 am
by HQentity
I took the worm drive out to count the number of teeth (both the new and the old worm gear have 23 teeth) and have found that the gear is starting to get damaged in exactly the same way as the old gear:
For now I have replaced the worm gear with the old one to save the life on the new one.
I believe I have a 3 rail because of this post
here. My reverse is next to 1st?
I've put a small amount of grease at the base of the cable near the gearbox, and a small amount of wd40 in the speedo end. It hasn't got any worse from it thankfully.
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 10:45 am
by Jon Tilson
Looks like the internal cog is damaged or there is a foreign body lurking within.
Is this a non overdrive box?
If so you need the angled drive on a dolomite....not on a Sprint bizarrely.
Jonners
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 11:24 am
by HQentity
Yeah this is a non overdrive box. But I spoke to Tony a while back and we concluded I didn't need an angle drive, is this what you mean?
Maybe I should try and get inside my gearbox and see whats going on...
Yes.......
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 11:37 am
by sprint95m
HQentity wrote:I believe I have a 3 rail because of this post
here. My reverse is next to 1st?
Indeed Kyle, you have a three rail 'box.
Like Jon, I suspect your 'box is the problem.
It may be best to change the 'box for a s/h one?
I have a working 'box from a '72 1850 (56,000 miles) which you are welcome to (if you can arrange collection from KW1).
By the way, you don't need an angle drive. These are required for o/d 'boxes though.
Ian.
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 11:40 am
by matt of the vivas
It could be the speedo head at fault, partly seized. Fairly common on older cars. It would explain both faults - the repeated chewing up of the drive cogs and the low speed reading.
Worth seeing if you can find a good used replacement to try.
Re: Speedo reading half
Posted: Sat May 23, 2015 12:40 pm
by HQentity
Thanks Ian, will definitely consider it if I can't fix the speedo! I'm a bit hesitant to change the gearbox though as this one is great. Do you know if Parcelforce etc have weight limits?
Is it possible to dismantle speedo heads? There has been a small amount of noise coming out of the speedo head so I suspect you might be right!
Update: dismantled the speedo, everything seems to be in good order, there was one part that was a bit stiff, a sort of plastic 'latch' that connected to the odometer cog. I cleaned it up. Otherwise all very smooth though, no reason to think it would struggle that badly.