Thick walled engine blocks

Locked
Message
Author
Sprint36
Posts: 260
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 5:19 pm

Thick walled engine blocks

#1 Post by Sprint36 » Mon May 15, 2006 12:29 pm

Mentioned in this description:<br>
<br>
<!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="http://www.mikeabbasclassiccars.co.uk/c ... page_2.htm" target="top">Broadspeed Sprint for sale</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--><br>
<br>
Anyone know any more?<br>
<br>
David

<p></p><i></i>

KWM338R
Posts: 189
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2004 2:47 pm

How would one...

#2 Post by KWM338R » Mon May 15, 2006 1:10 pm

change gear in that car, there doesn't appear to be gearstick?<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Mark

<p></p><i></i>

davepoth
Posts: 856
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 9:46 pm

Re: How would one...

#3 Post by davepoth » Mon May 15, 2006 1:42 pm

I'm pretty sure the homologation rules state that the engine block must be standard. I couldn't find the '74 group 1 rules on the net anywhere though.

<p></p><i></i>

Stephen Grellet
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 2:59 am

Broadspeed

#4 Post by Stephen Grellet » Mon May 15, 2006 10:14 pm

I have never heard of a thickwall block as bore wear or weakness etc does not seem to be a problem. What they did make was a chromium iron block which was much stronger, and helped prevent cracks around the main bearing webs. Scott what did they find with your engine re the bearings?<br>
<br>
Regds Stephen

<p></p><i></i>

Carsreunited
Posts: 1673
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 6:45 pm

Re: Broadspeed

#5 Post by Carsreunited » Mon May 15, 2006 10:38 pm

Still a mystery to be honest. A mixture of surge or the intelligent money is on the lack of crank damper. I wasn't using more than 7500rpm but I've heard from someone in the know that 7200rpm is critical on an undamped crank.<br>
<br>
I got through the last race with no problem and that was with a new winged sump but then I didn't exceed 6800rpm.<br>
<br>
Scott

<p></p><i></i>

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest