1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#1 Post by yorkshire_spam »

Having had issues getting the water passages to seal when refitting the inlet manifold on Binny (1850 Dolomite) I thought it would be interesting to compare the new blue grey ones against red-ish NOS style ones.

The difference in thickness is really quite large...

Red-ish NOS ones - 0.0215" (about 22 thou on average)
Blue gray ones - 0.065"

About 3 times thicker!

Image

Image
Image
GTS290N
TDC Member
Posts: 1022
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:00 pm

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#2 Post by GTS290N »

It's some years since I bought some.
The first were purchased from Rimmer Bros, they were made of very thin paper - I didn't fit them, they just didn't look right.
I then bought from TD Fitchett, the gaskets were much thicker. Used them, no issues.
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7249
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#3 Post by Carledo »

I recently fitted a Rimmers blue manifold gasket to Rich's Sprint. Both head and (Weber) manifold were spotlessly clean and appeared, to all intents and purposes, flat. It leaked like a sieve, as soon as the coolant level reached the joint, without even starting the engine. I had to remove the manifold again and ladle a load of silicone round the water gallery before it would seal and hold running pressure! I wasn't impressed! But i'm at a bit of a loss as to WHY? Is the paper they are using somehow uneven in thickness? Or porous? It doesn't make sense!

Steve
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#4 Post by yorkshire_spam »

Carledo wrote: Sun Jul 08, 2018 9:09 pm It leaked like a sieve, as soon as the coolant level reached the joint, without even starting the engine. I had to remove the manifold again and ladle a load of silicone round the water gallery before it would seal and hold running pressure!
Exactly the issue I had the first time I tried to refit the manifold on Binny.
I might make enquiries with some gasket companies about getting a batch closer to the original thickness made up.
Image
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13582
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#5 Post by xvivalve »

Both 1850 and Sprint inlets have in my opinion a missing bolt; ideally they both need another in the bottom right corner to effect a good seal to the water jacket. My thinking is a thicker gasket is able to be compressed by the bolts and should therefore be a better option...EXCEPT in the bottom right hand corner where the missing bolt cannot do its job. A thinner gasket has less compressibility and therefore the manifold gets a more even interface with the head and no leak.
User avatar
Toledo Man
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 7542
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:52 pm
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#6 Post by Toledo Man »

I fitted one from TD Fitchett a few years back when I swapped the inlet manifold. It hasn't leaked ever since.
Toledo Man

West Yorkshire Area Organiser
Meetings take place on the first Wednesday of the month at 8.00pm at The Railway, 1 Birstall Lane, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1JJ

2003 Volvo XC90 D5 SE (PX53 OVZ - The daily driver)
2009 Mercedes-Benz W204 C200 CDI Sport (BJ58 NCV - The 2nd car)
1991 Toyota Celica GT (J481 ONB - a project car)
Former stable of SAY 414M (1974 Toledo), GRH 244D (1966 1300fwd), CDB 324L (1973 1500fwd), GGN 573J (1971 1500fwd), DCP 625S (1977 Dolomite 1300) & LCG 367N (1975 Dolomite Sprint), NYE 751L (1972 Dolomite 1850 auto) plus 5 Acclaims and that's just the Triumphs!

Check my blog at http://triumphtoledo.blogspot.com
My YouTube Channel with a bit of Dolomite content.

"There is only one way to avoid criticsm: Do nothing, say nothing and BE nothing." Aristotle
dollyman
TDC Cheshire Area Organiser
Posts: 1410
Joined: Wed May 17, 2017 6:28 pm
Location: NANTWICH.

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#7 Post by dollyman »

The redish gaskets were the ones that are in "payen" gasket sets therefore good quality. You to get spurious makes of gasket sets years ago and they would not either :( I shudder to think of all the gaskets i have thrown away over the years.

Tony.
NOW A CLUB MEMBER 2017057 :bluewave:
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13582
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#8 Post by xvivalve »

Reddish = asbestos containing gasket.

It was good stuff in so many ways, that asbestos!!
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 996
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

Re: 1850 Inlet manifold gasket comparison

#9 Post by yorkshire_spam »

xvivalve wrote: Sun Jul 08, 2018 10:33 pm Both 1850 and Sprint inlets have in my opinion a missing bolt; ideally they both need another in the bottom right corner to effect a good seal to the water jacket. My thinking is a thicker gasket is able to be compressed by the bolts and should therefore be a better option...EXCEPT in the bottom right hand corner where the missing bolt cannot do its job. A thinner gasket has less compressibility and therefore the manifold gets a more even interface with the head and no leak.
I think the thicker gaskets can also prevent the O ring between the head and the manifold getting sufficient clamp to stop the front waterway leaking into no #1 inlet.
I'd like to meet whoever left that long waterway slot in the head at the rear and shake them warmly by the neck!
Image
Post Reply