Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.
Message
Author
tonybsa
TDC Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:54 pm

Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#1 Post by tonybsa »

I have just fit one of these new poly engine mounts to my Sprint.
I decided to give one a go as I am sick of extremely poor quality of the aftermarket rubber ones,on average they are lasting 2 years-about 3000 miles,on the right hand side,before collapsing and dumping the oil pump onto the steering rack clamp.
So I bit the bullet,and payed the money.
Easiest mounting I have ever fitted to a Sprint-it just went on.No messing about trying to line holes up.
The bolt heads for the subframe did not foul on the poly,unlike the rubber ones,which you have to fight to get the bolts in.
The engine now sits much higher,and after a short test drive(about 20 miles),I can detect no extra noise or vibration coming through the body.
Seriously impressed,and to all those involved in the development of these mounts-you have done an excellant job.
Worth every penny.
User avatar
RSi
TDC Member
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:06 pm
Location: Isle of Lewis (Outer Hebrides)

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#2 Post by RSi »

That's good to hear, I've got them on mine but not tested.
Triumph Dolomite Sprint (RNK 957W)

Automatic, porcelain white - 52,820, genuine mileage (warranted).

Built 26/6/1980, 3 previous owners (2 within the same family).

Supplied by Lavender Hill Garage Ltd, Enfield, London, by garage owner Jimmy Metcalfe on 30th September 1980 to Geoffrey Robinson, Enfield, London.

Club Membership No: 2017092
Richard the old one
TDC Member
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#3 Post by Richard the old one »

I have also read a good report about the 1500 RWD mounts which is also applicable for the 1300 engine. I have obtained a set but have not yet fitted them on one of my 1500cc engines. Chris also has the softer mount which is used on the 1850.
cleverusername
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 1560
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:04 pm

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#4 Post by cleverusername »

So far so good. Good to hear there isn't any extra noise or vibration. I avoid poly bushes because I fear that many are too firm and will transfer loads to other areas of the car and cause damage. It sounds like they have used the correct firmness of material in this case.

Of course the real test is how well they hold up after a few thousand miles have been put on them.

Anyway thanks for testing them and sharing your results.
Richard the old one
TDC Member
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#5 Post by Richard the old one »

In respect to the non Sprint mounts. I took a selection of original mounts down to Chris Witor and he measured their hardness before he went into production.
tonybsa
TDC Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:54 pm

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#6 Post by tonybsa »

cleverusername wrote: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:11 am So far so good. Good to hear there isn't any extra noise or vibration. I avoid poly bushes because I fear that many are too firm and will transfer loads to other areas of the car and cause damage. It sounds like they have used the correct firmness of material in this case.

Of course the real test is how well they hold up after a few thousand miles have been put on them.

Anyway thanks for testing them and sharing your results.
I am the same as you,I normally avoid polybushes at all costs,but the pattern rubber mounts for the Sprint,are,quite frankly,ppoor.
User avatar
RSi
TDC Member
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:06 pm
Location: Isle of Lewis (Outer Hebrides)

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#7 Post by RSi »

tonybsa wrote: Thu Sep 03, 2020 8:15 pm
cleverusername wrote: Thu Sep 03, 2020 10:11 am So far so good. Good to hear there isn't any extra noise or vibration. I avoid poly bushes because I fear that many are too firm and will transfer loads to other areas of the car and cause damage. It sounds like they have used the correct firmness of material in this case.

Of course the real test is how well they hold up after a few thousand miles have been put on them.

Anyway thanks for testing them and sharing your results.
I am the same as you,I normally avoid polybushes at all costs,but the pattern rubber mounts for the Sprint,are,quite frankly,ppoor.
So as not to confuse folk, when you say the "pattern rubber mounts for the Sprint,are,quite frankly,ppoor" - that doesn't apply to Chris Witor's new superflex mounts.
Triumph Dolomite Sprint (RNK 957W)

Automatic, porcelain white - 52,820, genuine mileage (warranted).

Built 26/6/1980, 3 previous owners (2 within the same family).

Supplied by Lavender Hill Garage Ltd, Enfield, London, by garage owner Jimmy Metcalfe on 30th September 1980 to Geoffrey Robinson, Enfield, London.

Club Membership No: 2017092
tonybsa
TDC Member
Posts: 188
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 9:54 pm

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#8 Post by tonybsa »

You are correct.Chris Witors are not rubber,,they are poly,and so far I would say very good.
User avatar
RSi
TDC Member
Posts: 648
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:06 pm
Location: Isle of Lewis (Outer Hebrides)

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#9 Post by RSi »

tonybsa wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:37 am You are correct.Chris Witors are not rubber,,they are poly,and so far I would say very good.
Superflex, that's not the same as poly, is it?
Triumph Dolomite Sprint (RNK 957W)

Automatic, porcelain white - 52,820, genuine mileage (warranted).

Built 26/6/1980, 3 previous owners (2 within the same family).

Supplied by Lavender Hill Garage Ltd, Enfield, London, by garage owner Jimmy Metcalfe on 30th September 1980 to Geoffrey Robinson, Enfield, London.

Club Membership No: 2017092
Richard the old one
TDC Member
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#10 Post by Richard the old one »

The SuperFlex logo states it is Polyurethane but I know that Chris measured the hardness of the original 1850 / 1500 / 1300 mounts so that he could produce the replacement SuperFlex mounts to match them.
User avatar
TrustNo1
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 1635
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:48 pm

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#11 Post by TrustNo1 »

RSi wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:50 am
tonybsa wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:37 am You are correct.Chris Witors are not rubber,,they are poly,and so far I would say very good.
Superflex, that's not the same as poly, is it?

SUPERFLEX is the trading name of the company and Chis Witor is the guy that sells it, POLY is the type of material used (polyurethane)
There are several other companies who make Poly bushes, not always of the same quality, you can buy the two part liquid and make your own if you want to make mounds and mounting plates as well.
As for the hardness of poly that is rated as 'shore' the higher the number the harder the material, the colour of a poly bush as no relation to its shore rating as its just dye added to the clear mix but some companies will use a certain colour for each hardness.
Some people are like Slinky's, they serve no real purpose in life but bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6502
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Aye..

#12 Post by sprint95m »

Just to confuse matters, as if it wasn't bad enough....
RSi wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:50 am Superflex, that's not the same as poly, is it?
There is a polyurethane bush manufacturer in North wales whose trading name is Polybush!


Ian.

As an aside...
I rather suspect that you Murdo, like me, wouldn't ever buy anything from them for the same reason?
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
User avatar
TrustNo1
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 1635
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 5:48 pm

Re: Aye..

#13 Post by TrustNo1 »

sprint95m wrote: Sun Sep 06, 2020 7:36 pm Just to confuse matters, as if it wasn't bad enough....
RSi wrote: Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:50 am Superflex, that's not the same as poly, is it?
There is a polyurethane bush manufacturer in North wales whose trading name is Polybush!


Ian.

As an aside...
I rather suspect that you Murdo, like me, wouldn't ever buy anything from them for the same reason?
I've come across 'Polybush' before, has their quality got any better in the last 10 years?
Some people are like Slinky's, they serve no real purpose in life but bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
new to this
TDC Member
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:53 pm
Location: Harrow Middlesex

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#14 Post by new to this »

Just ordered these engine mounts,any one know weather the bolt studs are imperial or metric ?

thanks Dave
Richard the old one
TDC Member
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 10:06 pm
Location: Bristol

Re: Chris Witor Poly engine mount.

#15 Post by Richard the old one »

The 1300,1500 & 1850 type are imperial as I was able to reuse the nuts that I took off.
Post Reply