SU HS8 carbs

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
ham204
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 246
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:14 pm

SU HS8 carbs

#1 Post by ham204 »

Are HS8 carbs a straight swap for the HS6's in the Sprint?
1972 Spitfire MK IV
1972 Stag
1980 Sprint

1962 Land Rover Series 2a
1961 Land Rover Series 2a (under restoration)
1983 Land Rover Series 3

1995 Suzuki Samurai SJ413

1972 MGB GT (banished for being too tight to fit in it)
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13580
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#2 Post by xvivalve »

No, you'll need larger diameter carb mounts with a 2" diameter hole (the club supply these) and you'll need to reamer the inlet manifold ports to 2" too, preferably matched to the carb mounts to avoid a step.

Also, to get their benefit you'll need an uprated camshaft which in turn will require valve clearance adjustments.
dursley92
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 524
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 12:39 am

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#3 Post by dursley92 »

I have an unused set of the club 2" aluminium mounts, if anyone wants them send me a pm.

I went for a pair of 45DHLA instead.
Russ Cooper
Dursley
UK
User avatar
Bumpa
TDC Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:08 am
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#4 Post by Bumpa »

There is generally no benefit to be gained from fitting larger carbs unless the engine is altered to let it breathe more easily, such as larger valves and performance camshaft. Putting bigger carbs on a standard engine can actually reduce performance as the velocity of air passing through the carb will be reduced.
Mike
(1969 MGB GTV8, 1977 Dolomite 1850HL, 1971 MGB roadster now all three on the road)
User avatar
ham204
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 246
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:14 pm

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#5 Post by ham204 »

Bumpa wrote: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:23 am There is generally no benefit to be gained from fitting larger carbs unless the engine is altered to let it breathe more easily, such as larger valves and performance camshaft. Putting bigger carbs on a standard engine can actually reduce performance as the velocity of air passing through the carb will be reduced.
Agreed, a hotter cam is in my wishlist though I cannot see how I can improve the exhaust breathing.
1972 Spitfire MK IV
1972 Stag
1980 Sprint

1962 Land Rover Series 2a
1961 Land Rover Series 2a (under restoration)
1983 Land Rover Series 3

1995 Suzuki Samurai SJ413

1972 MGB GT (banished for being too tight to fit in it)
cleverusername
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 1560
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:04 pm

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#6 Post by cleverusername »

ham204 wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 4:16 pm
Bumpa wrote: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:23 am There is generally no benefit to be gained from fitting larger carbs unless the engine is altered to let it breathe more easily, such as larger valves and performance camshaft. Putting bigger carbs on a standard engine can actually reduce performance as the velocity of air passing through the carb will be reduced.
Agreed, a hotter cam is in my wishlist though I cannot see how I can improve the exhaust breathing.
Assuming you have got rid of the standard exhaust, with its daft routing, you are probably correct. There isn't room for a better manifold.

Saying that, people can get more power out of a Sprint, so that implies that the manifold isn't that big a limitation.
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7247
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#7 Post by Carledo »

cleverusername wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 5:01 pm
ham204 wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 4:16 pm
Bumpa wrote: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:23 am There is generally no benefit to be gained from fitting larger carbs unless the engine is altered to let it breathe more easily, such as larger valves and performance camshaft. Putting bigger carbs on a standard engine can actually reduce performance as the velocity of air passing through the carb will be reduced.
Agreed, a hotter cam is in my wishlist though I cannot see how I can improve the exhaust breathing.
Assuming you have got rid of the standard exhaust, with its daft routing, you are probably correct. There isn't room for a better manifold.

Saying that, people can get more power out of a Sprint, so that implies that the manifold isn't that big a limitation.
The log manifold, for all the scorn I heap on it, doesn't actually flow THAT badly. You can get a bigger bore downpipe and open up the exit holes in the manifold to match. Which'd probably be enough to cope with a pair of 2" SUs and a warmer cam.

Steve
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
SprintV8
TDC Member
Posts: 995
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:49 pm
Location: Sutton,Surrey.

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#8 Post by SprintV8 »

cleverusername wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 5:01 pm
ham204 wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 4:16 pm
Bumpa wrote: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:23 am There is generally no benefit to be gained from fitting larger carbs unless the engine is altered to let it breathe more easily, such as larger valves and performance camshaft. Putting bigger carbs on a standard engine can actually reduce performance as the velocity of air passing through the carb will be reduced.
Agreed, a hotter cam is in my wishlist though I cannot see how I can improve the exhaust breathing.
Assuming you have got rid of the standard exhaust, with its daft routing, you are probably correct. There isn't room for a better manifold.

Saying that, people can get more power out of a Sprint, so that implies that the manifold isn't that big a limitation.
There is a better four branch works style manifold (Equal length pipes)
Mega expensive and hard to get hold off.
Hence why folk don’t change this.
Unless your going all out racing I’ll keep with the standard manifold

Minis the old proper ones use to benefit from bigger carb(s)
without any engine mods or tweaks.
So what you said is technically wrong.

Changing to a LCB (Long Centre Branch) manifold was also more beneficial.
2011 Mini Clubman John Cooper Works. S Daily Driver.
1980 Dolomite Sprint with a touch of BLTS
Balanced Lightened and Tweaked 13B Rotary and SsuperCharged.
Back in my possession 22 September 2019.
Rebuilding the Sprint time taken so far, 111Hrs@15/12/2020
212Hrs @31/12/2021
352 @ 28/11/2022
455Hrs @ 20/10/2023
565Hrs @ 07/12/2024
This is time taken at the Sprint not necessary time worked.

Member TDC no 0471

Project 13B Sprint now back on..
No Pistons No Cams how’s it gonna Run Brap Brap?
User avatar
soe8m
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:13 am
Location: The continent

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#9 Post by soe8m »

SprintV8 wrote:
Minis the old proper ones use to benefit from bigger carb(s)
without any engine mods or tweaks.
So what you said is technically wrong.
Your local petrol station will benefit of the HS8's. Otherwise it's not much use on a std engine. The HS6 are not restrictive and oversized.

One of my sprints has 139 hp at the rear wheels with std cam and HS6 by optimizing the head and raising compression ratio. The sprint engine in std form is restrictive, not the carbs. Bigger carbs on a std engine will result in slower airspeed through the venturi so low rpm torque will even be less.

Jeroen
Classic Kabelboom Company. For all your wiring needs. http://www.classickabelboomcompany.com
User avatar
ham204
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 246
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:14 pm

Re: SU HS8 carbs

#10 Post by ham204 »

cleverusername wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 5:01 pm
ham204 wrote: Wed Mar 09, 2022 4:16 pm
Bumpa wrote: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:23 am There is generally no benefit to be gained from fitting larger carbs unless the engine is altered to let it breathe more easily, such as larger valves and performance camshaft. Putting bigger carbs on a standard engine can actually reduce performance as the velocity of air passing through the carb will be reduced.
Agreed, a hotter cam is in my wishlist though I cannot see how I can improve the exhaust breathing.
Assuming you have got rid of the standard exhaust, with its daft routing, you are probably correct. There isn't room for a better manifold.

Saying that, people can get more power out of a Sprint, so that implies that the manifold isn't that big a limitation.
I have a straight exhaust apart from the up and down to avoid the rear axle.
1972 Spitfire MK IV
1972 Stag
1980 Sprint

1962 Land Rover Series 2a
1961 Land Rover Series 2a (under restoration)
1983 Land Rover Series 3

1995 Suzuki Samurai SJ413

1972 MGB GT (banished for being too tight to fit in it)
Post Reply