Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#1 Post by yorkshire_spam »

Right... as far as I can see the adjusters are fitted on the correct sides, they are greased and free moving, the adjuster arms move when the hand-brake is applied.
Any yet.... every time I check the adjustment on the rears (usually just after the MOT when the tester comments on them) I find they need the slack taking up. Then for a week or two the rears are great. And then they go back to too slack.

Any ideas?
Image
User avatar
geeksteve
TDC Member
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:57 am
Location: Dorset
Contact:

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#2 Post by geeksteve »

Do you have the little H pieces? If not it wont work properly.

Also, unless your hand brake releases all the way it wont allow the adjuster to click (try moving the lever on the drum with the cable disconnected and see if you get the clicks).

Having said that, mine never bloody work either :lol:
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#3 Post by yorkshire_spam »

H pieces are in place, I'll have a faff with the drums on and see if I can hear the clicking. Thanks!
Image
DoloWIGHTY

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#4 Post by DoloWIGHTY »

Sounds like a classic example of wear in the end of the actuating fingers/levers.

An old school mechanic told me that when the cars were current they used to take the leavers off, build up the ends with weld and then file them back to profile. This would work for a while and then it would begin all over again.

I had the same on my 1850 and was lucky enough to purchase the last two brand new ones that Mick Dolphin had in stock (I believe they are also fitted to the GT6).
Magenta Auto Sprint
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:41 pm
Location: Silsoe, Beds

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#5 Post by Magenta Auto Sprint »

Have to had somebody operate the handbrake while you watch the brake show adjuster with the drum off?

Malcolm
matt of the vivas
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#6 Post by matt of the vivas »

Have you got the adjuster wheels on the right side, they are handed and if you get them wrong the brakes will actually deadjust themselves instead of taking up the slack.
User avatar
Bumpa
TDC Member
Posts: 691
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 11:08 am
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#7 Post by Bumpa »

They are a crap design for sure. Has anyone changed them to manually adjust? How?
Mike
(1969 MGB GTV8, 1977 Dolomite 1850HL, 1971 MGB roadster now all three on the road)
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7242
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#8 Post by Carledo »

Bumpa wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 1:47 pm They are a crap design for sure. Has anyone changed them to manually adjust? How?
The easy way is to drill a hole in the backplate so you can stick a screwdriver through and adjust them manually without removing wheels or drums.

Alternatively, it'd probably be possible to drill out the rivets retaining the top shoe stop bracket on the backplate and sub in a generic Girling manual adjuster, though this might involve taking an angle grinder to the shoes to make an extra bit of space. Not so much of a problem for nowadays, as shoes probably last for donkeys years with the low mileages covered, the average lifespan of a set of shoes is usually in excess of 100,000 miles. More are changed prematurely due to fluid contamination than ever wear out!

Another thought would be to sub in the manual adjust backplate and shoes etc from a 1300 or Toledo. I haven't even offered this up to try, the backplate would need redrilling for sure but don't know if other measurement discrepancies would make it impractical.

Steve
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#9 Post by yorkshire_spam »

Carledo wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:42 pm
Bumpa wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 1:47 pm They are a crap design for sure. Has anyone changed them to manually adjust? How?
The easy way is to drill a hole in the backplate so you can stick a screwdriver through and adjust them manually without removing wheels or drums.

Alternatively, it'd probably be possible to drill out the rivets retaining the top shoe stop bracket on the backplate and sub in a generic Girling manual adjuster, though this might involve taking an angle grinder to the shoes to make an extra bit of space. Not so much of a problem for nowadays, as shoes probably last for donkeys years with the low mileages covered, the average lifespan of a set of shoes is usually in excess of 100,000 miles. More are changed prematurely due to fluid contamination than ever wear out!

Another thought would be to sub in the manual adjust backplate and shoes etc from a 1300 or Toledo. I haven't even offered this up to try, the backplate would need redrilling for sure but don't know if other measurement discrepancies would make it impractical.

Steve
They are that much of a PITA I've been wondering about whether a GT6/Vitesse backplate can be fitted in place, I've been looking at shoe widths/diameters to see what's close to the originals on the 1850 but with a manual adjuster.
Looking at the original backplate I think the pressing would make fitting a manual adjuster directly impractical.
Image
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#10 Post by yorkshire_spam »

matt of the vivas wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 11:37 am Have you got the adjuster wheels on the right side, they are handed and if you get them wrong the brakes will actually deadjust themselves instead of taking up the slack.
As far as I can tell, but who knows for sure?
Should the hand-brake operated arm push the adjuster as the brake is applied or as it's released?
Image
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7242
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#11 Post by Carledo »

yorkshire_spam wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 3:50 pm
Carledo wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 2:42 pm
Bumpa wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 1:47 pm They are a crap design for sure. Has anyone changed them to manually adjust? How?
The easy way is to drill a hole in the backplate so you can stick a screwdriver through and adjust them manually without removing wheels or drums.

Alternatively, it'd probably be possible to drill out the rivets retaining the top shoe stop bracket on the backplate and sub in a generic Girling manual adjuster, though this might involve taking an angle grinder to the shoes to make an extra bit of space. Not so much of a problem for nowadays, as shoes probably last for donkeys years with the low mileages covered, the average lifespan of a set of shoes is usually in excess of 100,000 miles. More are changed prematurely due to fluid contamination than ever wear out!

Another thought would be to sub in the manual adjust backplate and shoes etc from a 1300 or Toledo. I haven't even offered this up to try, the backplate would need redrilling for sure but don't know if other measurement discrepancies would make it impractical.

Steve
They are that much of a PITA I've been wondering about whether a GT6/Vitesse backplate can be fitted in place, I've been looking at shoe widths/diameters to see what's close to the originals on the 1850 but with a manual adjuster.
Looking at the original backplate I think the pressing would make fitting a manual adjuster directly impractical.
I was thinking mainly about how the Toledo style backplate would match a Sprint axle case, which is a different kettle of fish altogether to Binny's 1850 unit.

The Toledo and 1850 axle cases are identical, so the Toledo manual adjust backplates along with cylinders, shoes, drums etc should swap over as a bolt on. Twill be a PITA cos you have to pull the half shafts to do it and it will pay to investigate different bores of wheel cylinder to get something matching the 1850s, fortunately the manual adjust cylinder is present on all the small chassis cars up to about 73 or so (I think ONLY the GT6 III got the self adjusters and maybe the last 1500 Spits, have to check that) so there's plenty of choice, maybe a Vitesse II cylinder would be good.

GT6 I and II had a larger diameter rear drum than any of the other small chassis cars whilst still retaining manual adjustment. Whether this is the SAME drum and backplate/shoes as the Toledo or whether the Toledo is smaller I couldn't say, my GT6 and Toledo ownership failed to overlap by more than 20 years!

Steve

You may well end up with a smaller diameter drum and littler shoes, but it's not that much change in overall braking effort, with the rear brakes not doing much anyway. Get some TJs and you'll be well away!
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
yorkshire_spam
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 990
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:35 pm
Location: Filey, North Yorkshire

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#12 Post by yorkshire_spam »

Carledo wrote: Mon Jul 04, 2022 4:58 pm
I was thinking mainly about how the Toledo style backplate would match a Sprint axle case, which is a different kettle of fish altogether to Binny's 1850 unit.

The Toledo and 1850 axle cases are identical, so the Toledo manual adjust backplates along with cylinders, shoes, drums etc should swap over as a bolt on. Twill be a PITA cos you have to pull the half shafts to do it and it will pay to investigate different bores of wheel cylinder to get something matching the 1850s, fortunately the manual adjust cylinder is present on all the small chassis cars up to about 73 or so (I think ONLY the GT6 III got the self adjusters and maybe the last 1500 Spits, have to check that) so there's plenty of choice, maybe a Vitesse II cylinder would be good.

GT6 I and II had a larger diameter rear drum than any of the other small chassis cars whilst still retaining manual adjustment. Whether this is the SAME drum and backplate/shoes as the Toledo or whether the Toledo is smaller I couldn't say, my GT6 and Toledo ownership failed to overlap by more than 20 years!

Steve

You may well end up with a smaller diameter drum and littler shoes, but it's not that much change in overall braking effort, with the rear brakes not doing much anyway. Get some TJs and you'll be well away!
It looks like (as far as I can see) GBS815 Toledo shoes are for the same diameter/width drums as GBS746 Dolomite shoes - 8" x 1.5"

Already running TJs on the front!
Image
User avatar
bazyerma
TDC Member
Posts: 292
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2015 5:23 pm
Location: Aberdeen

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#13 Post by bazyerma »

Hi All

All I can say is my disc conversion has one upside, other than looking cool, The hand brake is far better and even can do handbrake turns :mrgreen:

Sorry about my silly joke, couldnt help myself, carry on with really helpful answers!

FYI Looks better now I put new cables on and modified the links shorter!

Regards

Barry
Attachments
Looks better now I put new cables on!
Looks better now I put new cables on!
Hand brake first attempt.jpg (355.25 KiB) Viewed 1894 times
Aberdeen

1975 Triumph 1500 TC various shades of blue
matt of the vivas
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#14 Post by matt of the vivas »

Take the drums off and work the handbrake levers. Watch and see if the adjuster threads increase in length - which is correct and means they are taking up the slack - or decrease in which case they are on the wrong sides.
You will need to manually deadjust them back again to get the drums back on!
Contrary to popular belief - the auto adjusters do work fine if they are in good condition and everything is set up correctly.
Matt.
User avatar
Mad Mart
TDC Member
Posts: 8529
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: Winscombe, North Somerset, England
Contact:

Re: Rear brake auto(non-)adjusters

#15 Post by Mad Mart »

If the adjusters are on the wrong sides you can easily tell because of the ratchet mechanism. If they are on the wrong sides the arm will just glide over the ratchet. I have literally just had this problem on the project I'm working on.
Sprintless for the first time in 35+ years. :boggle2: ... Still Sprintless.

Engines, Gearboxes, Overdrives etc. rebuilt. PM me.


2012 Porsche Boxster 981 S


Image
Post Reply