anti roll bar ends

Track days, racing, rallying, hill climbs, autotests, tuning & uprating etc.
Post Reply
Message
Author
marko
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:50 pm
Location: newton abbot, south devon

anti roll bar ends

#1 Post by marko »

My uprights on the front arbiter are shot. The rubber is hanging out. I see that for 80 something quid you can buy polymers bushes ones. I cleaned the end up and found it to be exactly 1/2". I pushed an old mock up rod end on and bobs your uncle. All that's needed then is to cut a 1/2" unf thread on it, drill some bigger holes in the lower bar that holds them and your away.
I have all the stuff but some new rod ends so a.cost of 15 quid max for me. I'm not a racer but would like to save some money. Please give me your thoughts as the arb is sat on the bench getting scratched.
Thanks, Mark.
marko
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:50 pm
Location: newton abbot, south devon

Re: anti roll bar ends

#2 Post by marko »

Come on. Some help please.
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6503
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Hmmm..................

#3 Post by sprint95m »

I don't think that is such a good idea Mark.

Instead I would try different bushes. A while back someone posted on here that Dolomite shocker lower bushes fit.
I have not tried this myself, but am of the opinion that it is worth a punt (because these bushes from Superflex are not so very dear).




Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
marko
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:50 pm
Location: newton abbot, south devon

Re: anti roll bar ends

#4 Post by marko »

The lower shock bushes are totally wrong. The hole in th metal sleeve is only 3/8" id so no where near the 1/2" required. I'm sorry but I think you have the wrong end of the stick on this one. Thanks though. Mark
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6503
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Aha............

#5 Post by sprint95m »

It needs to be Superflex bushes because these have a removable sleeve.

As you have noticed, ordinary bushes are no good because the sleeves are bonded in.


Sorry, I should have pointed this out before.




Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
MIG Wielder
TDC Member
Posts: 2338
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 2:52 pm

Re: anti roll bar ends

#6 Post by MIG Wielder »

I had to Google the " Rod ends" but I now see what they are......
http://www.nfauto.co.uk/rod_ends.htm

Now this would look to be quite a good idea .

Does the bit of the anti-roll bar that goes through the centre hole in the Rod-end have to be machined accurately to be a tight fit ?
I seem to remember when I did mine that the anti roll bar had quite a rough finish.
The location of the ARB would be better but without the rubber bush I think there may be more road noise transfer ?

Cheers for now,
Tony.
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7253
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: anti roll bar ends

#7 Post by Carledo »

MIG Wielder wrote:I had to Google the " Rod ends" but I now see what they are......
http://www.nfauto.co.uk/rod_ends.htm

Now this would look to be quite a good idea .

Does the bit of the anti-roll bar that goes through the centre hole in the Rod-end have to be machined accurately to be a tight fit ?
I seem to remember when I did mine that the anti roll bar had quite a rough finish.
The location of the ARB would be better but without the rubber bush I think there may be more road noise transfer ?

Cheers for now,
Tony.
Thanks Tony! I thought he was talking about making a track rod end fit and was having trouble visualizing how that would work!

I would say that that rod end you pictured would work great and shouldn't be TOO noisy in service since it will still be rubber mounted to the subframe (in this case I think poly would be a DISadvantage) BUT it would HAVE to be a CLOSE interference fit on the AR bar or the damn thing would rattle its (and your) brains out! The knocking you get from even slightly worn drop link joints on "moderns" is warning enough! The only drawback I can see is that the original design pemits the bar to move through the bush to a certain extent to account for differences in apparent length from suspension travel whereas this system wouldn't allow this movement (admittedly not large) and might put too much strain on the (not very strong) subframe clamps.

Steve
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
soe8m
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:13 am
Location: The continent

Re: anti roll bar ends

#8 Post by soe8m »

You have to make a link from these using two a side. Then it can move without stress.

Jeroen
Classic Kabelboom Company. For all your wiring needs. http://www.classickabelboomcompany.com
Neil907

Re: anti roll bar ends

#9 Post by Neil907 »

soe8m wrote:You have to make a link from these using two a side. Then it can move without stress.

Jeroen
I agree with Jeroen.
Typically two are put back to back, sometimes with an adjustable link in between.
They also do not last that long as the dirt gets in them and they wear fast. You can get rubber dust boots for them to help.

Do Jigsaw not sell poly ends the same style as the originals which would probably be a better bet if the car is used regularly.
Post Reply