‘Improvement’ is such a subjective word
To be clear, I am not anti-modification and it would hypercritic if I were to condone it, because two of my Dollies have been modified (albeit mildly), mainly to enhance motorway cruising and reliability.
I am also not anti-engine upgrades, and some really well-executed conversations are out there, using not just Triumph engines.
Yet, the ‘good old’ European authorities view swapping engines as affecting its definition of an Historic Vehicle. Whether, or not, this will affect the UK in the future is open to debate. We can only see.
My earlier comment was only based upon there being very few 2-doors remaining and that ‘improving’ this one might not be the best long-term goal, because its value is more likely to lie in the fact that this car is one of the earliest survivors, which appears to be pretty unmolested from the pictures (despite being lowered, or has the suspension collapsed?)
Mind you, anything is better than seeing the car being fed into the crusher. It’s the owner’s car to do with as he/she chooses (obviously) but I only raise the points for consideration, not judgement.
R