Lower wishbone bearings

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.
Post Reply
Message
Author
marko
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 8:50 pm
Location: newton abbot, south devon

Lower wishbone bearings

#1 Post by marko »

I'm about to paint and replace the front suspension with poly bushes. The spare lower wishbones that I have have knackered bearings in them. Can they be polybushed or another bearing? What's the best quality to go for and what should I be looking at paying?
Mark.
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#2 Post by James467 »

Rimmer's have NOS ones with the rose joints. I wouldn't put polyushes in there, they are rose jointed for a reason.

15% off at the moment I think.
User avatar
Toledo Man
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 7542
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:52 pm
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#3 Post by Toledo Man »

I've fitted Super Flex ones without any problems. As far as I can tell, they're a direct replacement for the original part in polyurethane so the joint should function as Triumph intended. Super Flex isn't much harder than rubber so it shouldn't cause any problems...
Toledo Man

West Yorkshire Area Organiser
Meetings take place on the first Wednesday of the month at 8.00pm at The Railway, 1 Birstall Lane, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1JJ

2003 Volvo XC90 D5 SE (PX53 OVZ - The daily driver)
2009 Mercedes-Benz W204 C200 CDI Sport (BJ58 NCV - The 2nd car)
1991 Toyota Celica GT (J481 ONB - a project car)
Former stable of SAY 414M (1974 Toledo), GRH 244D (1966 1300fwd), CDB 324L (1973 1500fwd), GGN 573J (1971 1500fwd), DCP 625S (1977 Dolomite 1300) & LCG 367N (1975 Dolomite Sprint), NYE 751L (1972 Dolomite 1850 auto) plus 5 Acclaims and that's just the Triumphs!

Check my blog at http://triumphtoledo.blogspot.com
My YouTube Channel with a bit of Dolomite content.

"There is only one way to avoid criticsm: Do nothing, say nothing and BE nothing." Aristotle
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

No....

#4 Post by James467 »

The original lower wishbones are rose jointed. You cannot compare rose jointed wishbones to polybushed items!

Now if you mean the drag struts/arms, the arms that connect to the front of the subframe that's different.
User avatar
Toledo Man
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 7542
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:52 pm
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#5 Post by Toledo Man »

Maybe I shouldn't have opened this particular can of worms...

I'd better quit while I'm still not too far behind.
Toledo Man

West Yorkshire Area Organiser
Meetings take place on the first Wednesday of the month at 8.00pm at The Railway, 1 Birstall Lane, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1JJ

2003 Volvo XC90 D5 SE (PX53 OVZ - The daily driver)
2009 Mercedes-Benz W204 C200 CDI Sport (BJ58 NCV - The 2nd car)
1991 Toyota Celica GT (J481 ONB - a project car)
Former stable of SAY 414M (1974 Toledo), GRH 244D (1966 1300fwd), CDB 324L (1973 1500fwd), GGN 573J (1971 1500fwd), DCP 625S (1977 Dolomite 1300) & LCG 367N (1975 Dolomite Sprint), NYE 751L (1972 Dolomite 1850 auto) plus 5 Acclaims and that's just the Triumphs!

Check my blog at http://triumphtoledo.blogspot.com
My YouTube Channel with a bit of Dolomite content.

"There is only one way to avoid criticsm: Do nothing, say nothing and BE nothing." Aristotle
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#6 Post by James467 »

Toledo Man wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2018 7:32 pm Maybe I shouldn't have opened this particular can of worms...

I'd better quit while I'm still not too far behind.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
new to this
TDC Member
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:53 pm
Location: Harrow Middlesex

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#7 Post by new to this »

Toledo Man wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2018 7:13 pm I've fitted Super Flex ones without any problems. As far as I can tell, they're a direct replacement for the original part in polyurethane so the joint should function as Triumph intended. Super Flex isn't much harder than rubber so it shouldn't cause any problems...
Ive been looking into polyurethane rubber they measure it shore ratings,they do soft medium and hard,medium is 85 shore soft is 65 shore,rubber is about 40

Dave
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6503
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Hmmm.......

#8 Post by sprint95m »

James467 wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:27 pmI wouldn't put polyushes in there, they are rose jointed for a reason.
The reason being...?


thanks,
Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Hmmm.......

#9 Post by James467 »

sprint95m wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:02 pm
James467 wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2018 5:27 pmI wouldn't put polyushes in there, they are rose jointed for a reason.
The reason being...?


thanks,
Ian.
The rose joints allow the drag strut to be fitted and tightened up with relative slack manufacturing tolorences on the wishbone pivot. I need to draw a picture to illustrate it properly, as far as I can see a polybush with get worn quite quickly. I think Jonners explained it better than me. I'll try to find it.
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#10 Post by James467 »

If you think about it a poly bush will only work positively up and down with flex fore and aft from the drag struts.

The rose joint will work positively up and down as wells as fore and aft. Giving you a more positive feel to the suspension setup.

Make sense?
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6503
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Hmm….

#11 Post by sprint95m »

Indeed there was a thread on this subject some years ago.
If Jon offered a conclusive reason I don't remember it.

Quite a few of us have used Superflex bushes without any problems.
These are not like rubber bushes in that their (stainless) steel ferrule is not attached to the bush.

The major downside to the OE rose joint arrangement is water ingress.
Alas, the water shields fail..... I have seen the both fixing bolts and the mounting bracket holes wear dangerously.
I had a short article highlighting this problem published in Dolly Mixture 128 (May 2008).




Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6503
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Hmm….

#12 Post by sprint95m »

James467 wrote: Fri Feb 09, 2018 8:16 pm If you think about it a poly bush will only work positively up and down with flex fore and aft from the drag struts.

The rose joint will work positively up and down as wells as fore and aft. Giving you a more positive feel to the suspension setup.

Make sense?
I need to think about that.
Being honest, that is rather theoretical for me but I will try.

My first thought is "what about the upper wishbone bushes?".
I don't know of another car that has a rose jointed TCA. Are there any?


Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#13 Post by James467 »

Hmmm good point on the upper wishbone bushes.

Did the btcc cars have rose jointed TCAS? Someone must have done it.
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7249
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: Lower wishbone bearings

#14 Post by Carledo »

Don't know about the BTCC cars, but Toledo's DON'T have a rose joint on the inner end of the TCA from the factory. I've fitted quite a few polybushes to Toledos here cos the original rubber ones DO wear out and give some truly frightening symptoms of failure! Chris Witor does Poly specifically for Toledos. But i've hardly ever replaced a rose jointed one.

Steve

BTW, aside from real thouoghbred track cars, I can't think of anything else that uses a rose jointed inner TCA bush.
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6503
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Okay....

#15 Post by sprint95m »

I have considered this and am thinking that whether you go for Superflex (or indeed another brand)
or use a rose joint is a mute point because
the weakness in the front suspension is the tie rod, or more specifically its bushes.

Previously I have used Superflex replacements for the OE type but now I am going to use
Superflex bushes of the ST type with their replacement tie rods, (these being of T2000 origin).




Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
Post Reply