Wiring harness's
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 6:06 pm
I might be needing to get to get a new wiring harness and was wondering if the 1850 and the sprint ones are the same.
steve
steve
The Number One Club for owners of Triumph's range of small saloons from the 1960s and 1970s.
https://forum.triumphdolomite.co.uk/
I got a 1500HL loom to work with a Sprint engine. It is not so hard, you just take it out, pull it apart and put everything on the right side. Then tape it back together.Carledo wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:55 pm I've made a middle period 1850 loom fit an early Sprint, some obvious differences (the hazard switch doesn't matter as its in the dash subloom) but nothing that can't be sorted by careful matching. The worst was a difference that wasn't obvious (or expected) in the pin out of the plug that goes to the auto inhibit/ o/d/reverse switch loom not matching meaning, the car wouldn't crank over! But I sussed it eventually by tracking the wiring colour codes more carefully.
It would be a lot harder to make an OHV loom fit a slant or vice versa or a curved dash loom fit a plank dash car (i've done this last one too, took a big effort) Nothing is impossible but some swaps are easier than others!
As always, a wiring diagram for both donor and recipient is a big help, as is a good knowledge of Lucas colour code recognition!
Steve
True, but it's a lot easier to START with a slant loom where everything is already on the correct side!cleverusername wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 9:59 pmI got a 1500HL loom to work with a Sprint engine. It is not so hard, you just take it out, pull it apart and put everything on the right side. Then tape it back together.Carledo wrote: ↑Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:55 pm I've made a middle period 1850 loom fit an early Sprint, some obvious differences (the hazard switch doesn't matter as its in the dash subloom) but nothing that can't be sorted by careful matching. The worst was a difference that wasn't obvious (or expected) in the pin out of the plug that goes to the auto inhibit/ o/d/reverse switch loom not matching meaning, the car wouldn't crank over! But I sussed it eventually by tracking the wiring colour codes more carefully.
It would be a lot harder to make an OHV loom fit a slant or vice versa or a curved dash loom fit a plank dash car (i've done this last one too, took a big effort) Nothing is impossible but some swaps are easier than others!
As always, a wiring diagram for both donor and recipient is a big help, as is a good knowledge of Lucas colour code recognition!
Steve
One thing to be careful of the legal implications, which I'm afraid are a bit a dog's breakfast rules wise. For MOT exemption, as far as I understand it, you have to follow these rules https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... idance.pdfSteve28 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:03 am Cheers for the replies guys, the reason for my question is that my son is wanting to things with his 2door Toledo but not sure which way yet other than keeping it triumph, most recently the talk has been of a TR7 engine on a sprint gearbox and rear axle also with the curved dash, this seems at the moment the way he wants to go but it could change as conversations like this sometimes do.
Also if this is done where does the car stand in the tax and mot exemption ?
thanks again for your imput
steve
Nothing is set in concrete just yet its just this idea is the latest we have talked about, im aware of the subframe change and propshaft etc,cleverusername wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:44 amOne thing to be careful of the legal implications, which I'm afraid are a bit a dog's breakfast rules wise. For MOT exemption, as far as I understand it, you have to follow these rules https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... idance.pdfSteve28 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:03 am Cheers for the replies guys, the reason for my question is that my son is wanting to things with his 2door Toledo but not sure which way yet other than keeping it triumph, most recently the talk has been of a TR7 engine on a sprint gearbox and rear axle also with the curved dash, this seems at the moment the way he wants to go but it could change as conversations like this sometimes do.
Also if this is done where does the car stand in the tax and mot exemption ?
thanks again for your imput
steve
Now that at first seems to block any modifications but there is some leeway. basically you are allowed to change the engine to one which was used by that model when it was in production. Now that kind of depends if a Toledo is counted to be the same as a Dolomite. It would rule out a TR7 engine but if a Toledo is classed as a Dolomite it could have an 1850/Sprint engine.
Now for tax purposes, I believe the car just has to be 40 years old but I think you need to avoid a q plate, which means the point system https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-registration ... d-vehicles.
Just make sure you don't change too much and you will be fine. The final issue is insurance, insurance companies tend to charge more for modified cars, so I would get a few quotes before starting the build. To make sure you son can afford the insurance.
As his proposed mods, they should work. He will need a new subframe or mod his original subframe. So if he wants a project go for it. He should bare in mind that he is unlikely to get his money back at the end, it will probably be worth no more than a standard car.
I don't think the DVLA cares if people are replacing like for like. I think the rules are there to stop somebody dodging the IVA by using the identity of an old car but virtually non of the original components.Steve28 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:15 pmNothing is set in concrete just yet its just this idea is the latest we have talked about, im aware of the subframe change and propshaft etc,cleverusername wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:44 amOne thing to be careful of the legal implications, which I'm afraid are a bit a dog's breakfast rules wise. For MOT exemption, as far as I understand it, you have to follow these rules https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... idance.pdfSteve28 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:03 am Cheers for the replies guys, the reason for my question is that my son is wanting to things with his 2door Toledo but not sure which way yet other than keeping it triumph, most recently the talk has been of a TR7 engine on a sprint gearbox and rear axle also with the curved dash, this seems at the moment the way he wants to go but it could change as conversations like this sometimes do.
Also if this is done where does the car stand in the tax and mot exemption ?
thanks again for your imput
steve
Now that at first seems to block any modifications but there is some leeway. basically you are allowed to change the engine to one which was used by that model when it was in production. Now that kind of depends if a Toledo is counted to be the same as a Dolomite. It would rule out a TR7 engine but if a Toledo is classed as a Dolomite it could have an 1850/Sprint engine.
Now for tax purposes, I believe the car just has to be 40 years old but I think you need to avoid a q plate, which means the point system https://www.gov.uk/vehicle-registration ... d-vehicles.
Just make sure you don't change too much and you will be fine. The final issue is insurance, insurance companies tend to charge more for modified cars, so I would get a few quotes before starting the build. To make sure you son can afford the insurance.
As his proposed mods, they should work. He will need a new subframe or mod his original subframe. So if he wants a project go for it. He should bare in mind that he is unlikely to get his money back at the end, it will probably be worth no more than a standard car.
regarding the Q plate shouldn't that be the case with most of our cars as a large amount will of had them change over the years, the toledo has got a different engine and gearbox from the original and i think the front subframe has been changed, we have also had to change the rear axle.
Lastly he has no intention of selling it as it was the first car he had which i bought and gave it to him as his first car after we built it up together having been off the road around 20 years so its not about the money but the bond he has with the car.
steve
I agree with giving minimal information to the government, just stay the right side of the law. I take the opposite policy with insurance, don't want to give them any get out if I need them to payout.Carledo wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:53 pm
Incidentally, I put the Carledo on the road in 2011, years before it became tax exempt or MOT exempt (if it was liable for MOT exemption at all, which is dubious) And i've continued to get it MOT'd every year since. But this means that whenever the tax rolls round for renewal, the car is already MOT'd so I never even get ASKED the question of whether it is exempt or not. It's my firm policy to never give a give a govt agency information that may later be used against me when they, inevitably, move the goalposts! I'd advise anyone in a similar position to do likewise!
I didn't mention anything about ruined, I just said that you are unlikely to get your money back. A genuine Sprint is worth more than a Dolomite that has been Sprinted, for example. Also you can't base values on asking prices. Ebay is a good place to see this, since you can find out what cars sold for. Many cars have ambitious asking prices but either don't sell or go for far less.I also can't agree with the person who suggested that a Toledo "ruined" in this fashion is worth the same or less than a similar condition standard car. Available data (which I track closely from obvious interest) from the few completed projects of this type offered for sale (and sold) seems to indicate an approximate value around double or more that of a similar condition standard car! So go for it and good luck! It makes a fun vehicle!
I used the word "ruined" in parenthesis and a large dose of irony! People like me are often approached by the "rivet counters" at shows and suchlike to be told "you've ruined that mate!" It's become a standing joke in the modding fraternity, look on Retro Rides forum, there's a whole thread devoted to the subject with many pictures of "ruined" cars!cleverusername wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 8:27 amI agree with giving minimal information to the government, just stay the right side of the law. I take the opposite policy with insurance, don't want to give them any get out if I need them to payout.Carledo wrote: ↑Tue Mar 24, 2020 9:53 pm
Incidentally, I put the Carledo on the road in 2011, years before it became tax exempt or MOT exempt (if it was liable for MOT exemption at all, which is dubious) And i've continued to get it MOT'd every year since. But this means that whenever the tax rolls round for renewal, the car is already MOT'd so I never even get ASKED the question of whether it is exempt or not. It's my firm policy to never give a give a govt agency information that may later be used against me when they, inevitably, move the goalposts! I'd advise anyone in a similar position to do likewise!
I didn't mention anything about ruined, I just said that you are unlikely to get your money back. A genuine Sprint is worth more than a Dolomite that has been Sprinted, for example. Also you can't base values on asking prices. Ebay is a good place to see this, since you can find out what cars sold for. Many cars have ambitious asking prices but either don't sell or go for far less.I also can't agree with the person who suggested that a Toledo "ruined" in this fashion is worth the same or less than a similar condition standard car. Available data (which I track closely from obvious interest) from the few completed projects of this type offered for sale (and sold) seems to indicate an approximate value around double or more that of a similar condition standard car! So go for it and good luck! It makes a fun vehicle!
I can understand why that would be the case. I would be willing to buy a car you had modified because based on your contributions here, you know what you are doing. A car modified by someone I didn't know, I would be far more wary. I would have less concern if it was merely an upgrade to similar spec of the same model.
However if it was a modification that involved an engine never used in that car and other non-standard parts, I would be cautious. I would have no idea whether they were a competent welder, for example, so how would I know if modified mountings for components were secure. Then there are issues like weight distribution, have they properly adjusted the suspension to take into account the weight of the new engine? The further from standard spec you take a car, the more skill you need to do it properly.
So I can see why people can be wary of modded cars. You do need a bit of expertise or someone to advise you that has such knowledge, to buy such a vehicle.