introducing myself and my project

Restoring your car? Tell us about it here!
Message
Author
glassworks

introducing myself and my project

#1 Post by glassworks »

hi there,ive a dolomite sprint now for over four years and finally gettin around to do something with it,im wondering if anyone has mated the saab 2.3 block to the sprint gearbox,this is probably been posted before since its a fairly logical modification,...in theory anyway.cheers :)
triumphtoledo
TDC Toledo Registrar
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:25 pm

Re: introducing myself and my project

#2 Post by triumphtoledo »

Not as far as I know. The SAAB 2.3-litre unit may have Triumph roots but it doesn't even share any components. Even the 99 Turbo engine (B / H series) would not be easy. Also, the Swedish cars are front-wheel-drive and the engines, on the pre-GM cars, are mounted back-to-front, compared to the Triumph.

R
glassworks

Re: introducing myself and my project

#3 Post by glassworks »

thanks for the speedy reply,i have the b type block,the h type and the 2.3,are they not the same casting as the sprint block,and therefore they should interchange,im more than likely wrong,but just thought id ask before i started dismanteling.
bifold

Re: introducing myself and my project

#4 Post by bifold »

Love to see some photos of your 72 Sprint 8) whats the vin number?
glassworks

Re: introducing myself and my project

#5 Post by glassworks »

its an irish car,limerick,by vin do you mean chassis number?ill look at it over the weekend.
glassworks

Re: introducing myself and my project

#6 Post by glassworks »

:oops: quick signiture edit cos bifold has eagle eyes :shock:
:bluewave:
Andybrad

Re: introducing myself and my project

#7 Post by Andybrad »

Welcome to the forum, love to see some pics :D
bifold

Re: introducing myself and my project

#8 Post by bifold »

glassworks wrote::oops: quick signiture edit cos bifold has eagle eyes :shock:
:bluewave:
I thought you might of had one of the two 1850 cars fitted with Sprint engines that were being evaluated back in 72,as far as I know nobody knows what happened to them? :D
glassworks

Re: introducing myself and my project

#9 Post by glassworks »

wouldnt it be funny if i had one of em! it belonged to a main dealer back in the day as far as i know,ill post up the chassis number for the craic.can you shed any light on my query bifold?
glassworks

Re: introducing myself and my project

#10 Post by glassworks »

cheers andybrad,i havent any pics on my phone but ill post soon,it would be triumph only pics i presume.
bifold

Re: introducing myself and my project

#11 Post by bifold »

glassworks wrote:wouldnt it be funny if i had one of em! it belonged to a main dealer back in the day as far as i know,ill post up the chassis number for the craic.can you shed any light on my query bifold?
I am not up on Saabs but a few chaps on here have very broad automotive knowledge and will be along soon :D
JPB

Re: introducing myself and my project

#12 Post by JPB »

triumphtoledo wrote:Not as far as I know. The SAAB 2.3-litre unit may have Triumph roots but it doesn't even share any components. Even the 99 Turbo engine (B / H series) would not be easy.
That hasn't prevented people fitting such units as the Lotus slant four into Dolomites. Where there's a will, etc. :)
triumphtoledo wrote:Also, the Swedish cars are front-wheel-drive and the engines, on the pre-GM cars, are mounted back-to-front, compared to the Triumph.
I wish that the owner of what was my sister-in-law's 1500/Saab hybrid project would come along to give us a progress report, but that car, after she borrowed it and broke its 1500 engine, which left her no choice but to buy it from the bloke who'd only bought it as a means of saving her hire charges when she's in the UK :evil: , was in the process of being reborn as a FWD 1850. The slight fly in that ointment being that the Saab 99 that donated its drivetrain was actually a 1700 :roll: and not the later 1850 version. When that fella went to collect it, he reported that the engine and 'box were mounted with only a slight bulge required to clear the front (back? :lol: ) of the 1700 slant and the tunnel aperture being modified to allow access to the chaincase.
And that was the last we heard about it. Saab-Triumph Mongrel man, or whatever you joined up as, please give us updated info.

By comparison, surely a later Saab engine, originally installed East-West in 9000s etc. would be a breeze? OK, so a lot of "Blue sky" thinking would be needed, but in a World where people have fitted GM big-block V8s to Reliant kittens and built cars around Merlin engines, surely Saab into Triumph shouldn't be too taxing? :D
User avatar
Oli_88
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:19 am
Location: Fleet

Re: introducing myself and my project

#13 Post by Oli_88 »

Iirc, there's a Saab 9-3X or something that's 4wd... That'd be entertaining in a Dolly...

Nice choice in cars by the way. I do love Integrales.
glassworks

Re: introducing myself and my project

#14 Post by glassworks »

cheers oli 88,yea integrale's are nice,but you never own one,it very much owns you.WHEN this engine goes in itl be an entertaining car,for sure:).my daily is a skyline r32 (didnt add to signiture cos some might get the wrong impression of me),rb20det is a gorgeous engine,ive seen a sprint with one in it when i searched the site,sweet work! :D

well said jpb,there are no rules or limits with cars. :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6502
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Hello and.......

#15 Post by sprint95m »

glassworks wrote:hi there,ive a dolomite sprint now for over four years and finally gettin around to do something with it
Welcome to the forum.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
Post Reply