Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.
Message
Author
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13569
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#1 Post by xvivalve »

First, the Rolon brand supplied under the Triumph part number:

Image

Note the pin hole for oil supply

Secondly a Jaguar OE part I have sourced:

Image

A much larger hole in the side of the casting for oil supply, and also through the rubber pad for chain lubrication


The Jag part is more expensive, of the order of low twenties through my supplier compared to the Rolon brand which is about a tenner less, but I'll not be using Rolon ever again.

Strangely, unless I'm not recalling the assembly correctly, the shaped spacer which sits between the main casting and block covers up the hole in both instances...?
User avatar
trackerjack
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 4727
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:33 pm
Location: hampshire

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#2 Post by trackerjack »

Hi Alun,
Liking what I see and take your point on the ridiculously small feed hole which would take vital seconds to energise the hydraulic function on start up.
The plate you mention on a Rolon one that I have here has a large hole in it so as to match up easily.

I also have a Nissan one that has a large hole and is a closer fit in the holder than the floppy Indian made Rolon ones. The pad on the Nissan one looks much better quality.

Its the same old story I think, supplier wants max profit and buys cheapest available and when it fails will say it was incorrctly fitted and of course the famous "my goodness thats the first one we have had fail" :roll:
track action maniac.

The lunatic is out................heres Jonny!
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13569
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#3 Post by xvivalve »

Oh, silly me, turn the spacer over and the central hole fits!

I thought for a moment I had a LHD spacer!! :lol:
User avatar
Mad Mart
TDC Member
Posts: 8529
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: Winscombe, North Somerset, England
Contact:

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#4 Post by Mad Mart »

I see neither of these has the locating lug as per the original type.
Sprintless for the first time in 35+ years. :boggle2: ... Still Sprintless.

Engines, Gearboxes, Overdrives etc. rebuilt. PM me.


2012 Porsche Boxster 981 S


Image
User avatar
tony g
TDC Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:02 pm
Location: Nr Kenilworth

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#5 Post by tony g »

Alun, which Jag is that from?

Tony
Membership 2014047
User avatar
Toledo Man
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 7542
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:52 pm
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#6 Post by Toledo Man »

This is a classic example of where we should pay that bit extra for a decent quality part. A small price to pay for total peace of mind.
Toledo Man

West Yorkshire Area Organiser
Meetings take place on the first Wednesday of the month at 8.00pm at The Railway, 1 Birstall Lane, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1JJ

2003 Volvo XC90 D5 SE (PX53 OVZ - The daily driver)
2009 Mercedes-Benz W204 C200 CDI Sport (BJ58 NCV - The 2nd car)
1991 Toyota Celica GT (J481 ONB - a project car)
Former stable of SAY 414M (1974 Toledo), GRH 244D (1966 1300fwd), CDB 324L (1973 1500fwd), GGN 573J (1971 1500fwd), DCP 625S (1977 Dolomite 1300) & LCG 367N (1975 Dolomite Sprint), NYE 751L (1972 Dolomite 1850 auto) plus 5 Acclaims and that's just the Triumphs!

Check my blog at http://triumphtoledo.blogspot.com
My YouTube Channel with a bit of Dolomite content.

"There is only one way to avoid criticsm: Do nothing, say nothing and BE nothing." Aristotle
User avatar
SprintMWU773V
TDC Staffs Area Organiser
Posts: 5429
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: The Old Asylum

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#7 Post by SprintMWU773V »

Are there plans to procure a batch of these/bring them into club stock?
Mark

1961 Chevrolet Corvair Greenbrier Sportswagon
1980 Dolomite Sprint project using brand new shell
2009 Mazda MX5 2.0 Sport
2018 Infiniti Q30
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13569
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#8 Post by xvivalve »

Yes Mark, I'm hopefully negotiating a discount for bulk purchase now that I've been able to compare and if consensus agrees?

It fits various Jags Tony, but most Jag specialist suppliers will only offer you the Rolon version. The ones that offer the OE part charge anything up to fifty quid for it!!

Is a locating lug critical when there are two bolts?
User avatar
tony g
TDC Member
Posts: 2283
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 11:02 pm
Location: Nr Kenilworth

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#9 Post by tony g »

I may have a contact that could help with pricing if I have the OE part number (group buy maybe?)

Tony
Membership 2014047
User avatar
SprintMWU773V
TDC Staffs Area Organiser
Posts: 5429
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: The Old Asylum

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#10 Post by SprintMWU773V »

You'd think with two bolts it'd be fine.
Mark

1961 Chevrolet Corvair Greenbrier Sportswagon
1980 Dolomite Sprint project using brand new shell
2009 Mazda MX5 2.0 Sport
2018 Infiniti Q30
Jon Tilson
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 11179
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Middlesex

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#11 Post by Jon Tilson »

The OE one has that locating boss with a hole for oil flow....goes in matching hole in block and cant leak sideways.

Its not there on the Jag one as we can see, but its surely just a matter of inserting a drilled dowel of the right size.

I'll order that Jag bit when its sourced.....we should all use it henceforward as a matter of course,

Jonners
Note from Admin: sadly Jon passed away in February 2018 but his humour and wealth of knowledge will be fondly remembered by all. RIP Jonners.
User avatar
SprintMWU773V
TDC Staffs Area Organiser
Posts: 5429
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: The Old Asylum

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#12 Post by SprintMWU773V »

Might be worth looking at producing a run of these little add-ons then to supply with the item? I doubt anyone would be willing to make one offs whereas someone might be willing to do a small run.

Equally I'm guessing you could use an original type body and just use the new slipper pad? Just thinking slightly ahead as I do have an original body. I also have a Renold NOS one but the talk of this locating piece will make me go and find it as it was advertised as a Jaguar one so I can compare with my original one.

Either way I'd still be interested to purchase one purely for stock.
Mark

1961 Chevrolet Corvair Greenbrier Sportswagon
1980 Dolomite Sprint project using brand new shell
2009 Mazda MX5 2.0 Sport
2018 Infiniti Q30
User avatar
xvivalve
TDC West Mids Area Organiser
Posts: 13569
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Over here...can't you see me?

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#13 Post by xvivalve »

I could speak to a local engineer about machining the dowels...anyone have an OE pattern?

Thanks for the offer Tony, but I'm already speaking direct with the manufacturer.

Jon, what does your Nissan one look like? Something that is mass produced may be available cheaper and unfortunately you can't usually argue against Nissan quality...
User avatar
Mad Mart
TDC Member
Posts: 8529
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: Winscombe, North Somerset, England
Contact:

Re: Timing Chain Tensioners: A comparison

#14 Post by Mad Mart »

I have a couple of OE bodies with the dowel/lug Alun.
Sprintless for the first time in 35+ years. :boggle2: ... Still Sprintless.

Engines, Gearboxes, Overdrives etc. rebuilt. PM me.


2012 Porsche Boxster 981 S


Image
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6502
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Maybe....

#15 Post by sprint95m »

you can't usually argue against Nissan quality...
Some of their owners could have a different opinion having had to pay to get it sorted.....
isn't it the Almera that goes so far off the timing that it can't be started because the timing chain has stretched too
much for the tensioner to cope?
I presume the chain being very long causes this problem.....?




Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
Post Reply