MSO 662P

Restoring your car? Tell us about it here!
Message
Author
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7256
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: MSO 662P

#376 Post by Carledo »

That sidelight, while a great idea, is definitely contrary to construction and use regs which state that a side marker light may not be less than a certain distance from the edge of the car Since this is why standard Dollies have their sidelights and indicators the illogical way round and Tony's sidelights are inboard of that, they are definitely in contravention.
Since I have my stock sidelights and indicators the logical but wrong way round, I also am in contravention of the regs, so I am not criticising, just saying for information!
I wanted to do the same indicator treatment on my Sprint and would have put the sidelights in the outer headlamp. The ridiculous price of Escort mkI indicator lights put me off the idea!

Steve
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
lazeruspete
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 822
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:15 pm

Re: MSO 662P

#377 Post by lazeruspete »

Carledo wrote: is definitely contrary to construction and use regs which state that a side marker light may not be less than a certain distance from the edge of the car
would that be an MOT thing?
1980 Dolomite Sprint Track Day Car....KLJ 895W. now redtopiffied :P

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=23031

Volkswagen Golf MK3 Gti....R301UUJ. RIP 22-5-13
Volkswagen Golf MK4 TDGTI 150 MM53VNT Sold 7-8-17
BMW 320d Coupe M-Sport YL08 XBZ with factory fitted Performance Pack - Sold 22/05/21
BMW 330d Touring M-Sport WN63 XPY - best daily ever

Proud TDC Member!
User avatar
shaunroche
TDC Member
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:49 pm
Location: Northwich

Re: MSO 662P

#378 Post by shaunroche »

lazeruspete wrote:
Carledo wrote: is definitely contrary to construction and use regs which state that a side marker light may not be less than a certain distance from the edge of the car
would that be an MOT thing?
The Road Vehicles Lighting Regulations 1989

Section 18b I think.....http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1989 ... on/18/made
Come and see some pretty shoddy, slow driving of a really well prepared competition Sprint here!

http://www.youtube.com/@theunknownworrier

Club Triumph Round Britain Reliability Run 2025 Fund raising page:

https://wonderful.org/fundraisers/n8AYV ... derful.org
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7256
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: MSO 662P

#379 Post by Carledo »

lazeruspete wrote:
Carledo wrote: is definitely contrary to construction and use regs which state that a side marker light may not be less than a certain distance from the edge of the car
would that be an MOT thing?
I don't think it's an MOT issue, the MOT regs are more like, is it there?, is it working? is it bright enough? Are they matching side to side?
Construction and use is a legal thing and there is a book 10 times as thick as the MOT manual governing virtually every detail of what you can and can't do with a car. There are rules for how low headlamps can be and how bright reverse lights can be (the rally trick of using a spotlight is definitely a no-no) Numberplates, as in the thread in the main section lately, are also covered by these regs. They are what plod cites when you get to court! I don't think many policemen carry a tape measure these days, but if just ONE does, he's the one i'll get stopped by! So I try to keep my cars inside the rules!

Steve
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
Tony Burd
TDC Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Andover Hants

Re: MSO 662P

#380 Post by Tony Burd »

Been MOT'd twice now at different stations. 1st year got 2 advisories,no bumpers and numberplate on bonnet, 2nd year nothing. It probably has lots of things that are subject to the rule book but common sense seems to rule with my local mot testers.

Not been pulled yet by the boys in blue, I think they're more interested on the young lads with Polos slammed to the floor with banded wheels at 45 degrees. :lol:
Modified Dolomite Sprint MSO 662P VA485 1973 Mimosa Sprint
ImageImageImage
Image
User avatar
Tony Burd
TDC Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Andover Hants

Re: MSO 662P

#381 Post by Tony Burd »

Finally got round to fitting the Janspeed exhaust today.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Sounds lovely, no more droning & it doesn't bang against the bodywork.:D
Last edited by Tony Burd on Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Modified Dolomite Sprint MSO 662P VA485 1973 Mimosa Sprint
ImageImageImage
Image
User avatar
Flyfisherman
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 980
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 10:42 am

Re: MSO 662P

#382 Post by Flyfisherman »

Tony Burd wrote:Sounds lovely, no more droning & it doesn't bang against the bodywork.:D
Tony

Any chance of a sound track

Paul
Image
User avatar
sprint95m
TDC Member
Posts: 6504
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 1:22 pm
Location: Caithness, Scotland

Hmm

#383 Post by sprint95m »

I think that your sidelights must be road legal Tony
because didn't cars come with that arrangement from new, e.g. the BMW 3 series from the 80s?
What is the point of manufacturers providing headlamps with the sidelight facility (pilot hole) if not?

Are sidelights actually needed, legally speaking that is?
My next door neighbour had a Kawasaki 750 sports bike which just had dip and main.



Anyhow, your car looks smart.



Ian.
TDC Forum moderator
PLEASE help us to maintain a friendly forum,
either PM or use Report Post if you see anything you are unhappy with. Thanks.
User avatar
Tony Burd
TDC Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Andover Hants

Re: MSO 662P

#384 Post by Tony Burd »

Flyfisherman wrote:
Tony Burd wrote:Sounds lovely, no more droning & it doesn't bang against the bodywork.:D
Tony

Any chance of a sound track

Paul
I'll see what I can do, my daughter has a GoPro camera, maybe I could strap it to the exhaust.
Modified Dolomite Sprint MSO 662P VA485 1973 Mimosa Sprint
ImageImageImage
Image
User avatar
Tony Burd
TDC Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Andover Hants

Re: Hmm

#385 Post by Tony Burd »

sprint95m wrote:I think that your sidelights must be road legal Tony
because didn't cars come with that arrangement from new, e.g. the BMW 3 series from the 80s?
What is the point of manufacturers providing headlamps with the sidelight facility (pilot hole) if not?

Are sidelights actually needed, legally speaking that is?
My next door neighbour had a Kawasaki 750 sports bike which just had dip and main.



Anyhow, your car looks smart.



Ian.
Thanks Ian, I think they are OK too.
Modified Dolomite Sprint MSO 662P VA485 1973 Mimosa Sprint
ImageImageImage
Image
User avatar
Tony Burd
TDC Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Andover Hants

Re: MSO 662P

#386 Post by Tony Burd »

Flyfisherman wrote:
Tony Burd wrote:Sounds lovely, no more droning & it doesn't bang against the bodywork.:D
Tony

Any chance of a sound track

Paul
Here you go Paul, not the best I'm afraid the camera was rattling a bit, but you get the idea.

https://youtu.be/5HOWpKQ7Jt0
Modified Dolomite Sprint MSO 662P VA485 1973 Mimosa Sprint
ImageImageImage
Image
GTS290N
TDC Member
Posts: 1022
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:00 pm

Re: MSO 662P

#387 Post by GTS290N »

Awesome!
Do the same again without the camera rattle and you could be making some cash from youtube!
User avatar
zombeh
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 699
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 12:36 am
Location: Isle of Wight

Re: MSO 662P

#388 Post by zombeh »

On the sidelights thing, C&U specifies a maximum distance from the sides of the car but not a minimum. The maximum distance for a dolly (it's age related) is 510mm so pretty much put them wherever you like.

Exhaust looks and sounds nice :)
User avatar
Tony Burd
TDC Member
Posts: 1248
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:36 pm
Location: Andover Hants

Re: MSO 662P

#389 Post by Tony Burd »

All the photos are back on this thread, well the ones I can edit.
Modified Dolomite Sprint MSO 662P VA485 1973 Mimosa Sprint
ImageImageImage
Image
User avatar
Toledo Man
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 7542
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:52 pm
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: MSO 662P

#390 Post by Toledo Man »

I've just been through the entire thread and there were only a handful of Photobucket links that needed fixing so it is all sorted.
Toledo Man

West Yorkshire Area Organiser
Meetings take place on the first Wednesday of the month at 8.00pm at The Railway, 1 Birstall Lane, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1JJ

2003 Volvo XC90 D5 SE (PX53 OVZ - The daily driver)
2009 Mercedes-Benz W204 C200 CDI Sport (BJ58 NCV - The 2nd car)
1991 Toyota Celica GT (J481 ONB - a project car)
Former stable of SAY 414M (1974 Toledo), GRH 244D (1966 1300fwd), CDB 324L (1973 1500fwd), GGN 573J (1971 1500fwd), DCP 625S (1977 Dolomite 1300) & LCG 367N (1975 Dolomite Sprint), NYE 751L (1972 Dolomite 1850 auto) plus 5 Acclaims and that's just the Triumphs!

Check my blog at http://triumphtoledo.blogspot.com
My YouTube Channel with a bit of Dolomite content.

"There is only one way to avoid criticsm: Do nothing, say nothing and BE nothing." Aristotle
Post Reply