
That's a picture of my beloved Sprint in Inca Yellow. It was a W plate and according to a friend (checked the VIN number) who worked the trade it was one of the last 50 ever made. Sold it in 1992.
Covid 19 will mean allot of cars aren't being listed at the moment.veloce_rosso wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 11:12 am Been searching the net and there's one that looks good for nearly 4k, which is a little too rich given the seller has said there are bubbles of rust on the doors.
Another which needs a new clutch, welding to the inner arches, boot... no doubt other places. He asking around £1200 sounds too much for a car that could potentially need a rebuild from the ground up. He says the engine runs but doesn't mean it's in good condition.
Other than these two, most of the other 1850s are abroad.
Thanks. Not seriously looking at the moment but it's interesting to compare prices. Having been around most cars all my life I know the description is often different to reality.cleverusername wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 6:28 pmCovid 19 will mean allot of cars aren't being listed at the moment.veloce_rosso wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 11:12 am Been searching the net and there's one that looks good for nearly 4k, which is a little too rich given the seller has said there are bubbles of rust on the doors.
Another which needs a new clutch, welding to the inner arches, boot... no doubt other places. He asking around £1200 sounds too much for a car that could potentially need a rebuild from the ground up. He says the engine runs but doesn't mean it's in good condition.
Other than these two, most of the other 1850s are abroad.
I agree with you about those cars, for 4K I would want something that was rust free. As for the other one, there is a good chance you might find more rot if you start digging.
Anyway hopefully something more promising will turn up.
Thanks Matt!matt of the vivas wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:17 pm Get in touch with James Shepard on here. Hes restoring an early 1850 that he will sell when its done, it will be a good one.
Hi James. Just seen the photos on your link and it looks a honest example. You don't live too far away from me, which will be handy once the situation eases. Out of interest, what colour are you having the Dolly painted?James467 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 28, 2020 9:14 pmThanks Matt!matt of the vivas wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 5:17 pm Get in touch with James Shepard on here. Hes restoring an early 1850 that he will sell when its done, it will be a good one.![]()
Yes I am currently restoring Nina, unfortunately due to the current situation I have slowed a bit as I am stuck with looking after the kids!! But it will leave me with a new paint job and fully wax (Bilt Hamber) rust protected, new brakes, electronic ignition, fully relayed cibie halogen headlamps (loom by Jeroen) the full works. When you are ready feel free to give me a shout.
I have a couple of updates to do, the rear wheel arches are now done and I just need to fit the outer sill.
https://forum.triumphdolomite.co.uk/vie ... 19&t=35610
veloce_rosso wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 1:02 pm What's the problem with waterless coolant? It seems to tolerate much higher temperatures and it doesn't corrode the rad or water pump.
Evans Waterless Coolant is more efficient than a water based coolant because it doesn't cavitate,No problem with it... but if the pump, rad and coolant system is well fettled it's just not needed imho. Oh another mod on my car is the Volvo header tank for the coolant system (it's on the thread I linked to)
Cheers,
Sam
Thanks Ian -- very insightful. I presume header tanks work in the same way as water expansion tanks. Sorry, this is where my Dolomite logic hits a brick wall.sprint95m wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 11:15 amveloce_rosso wrote: ↑Sun Apr 26, 2020 1:02 pm What's the problem with waterless coolant? It seems to tolerate much higher temperatures and it doesn't corrode the rad or water pump.Evans Waterless Coolant is more efficient than a water based coolant because it doesn't cavitate,No problem with it... but if the pump, rad and coolant system is well fettled it's just not needed imho. Oh another mod on my car is the Volvo header tank for the coolant system (it's on the thread I linked to)
Cheers,
Sam
Instead it stays in contact with all surfaces all the time, thereby eliminating localised boiling.
It has been around for decades in North America, just look at all the vehicle manufacturers using it.
Slant four engines are prone to cavitation at the back of the engine (hence why head gaskets blow between 3 and 4).
Triumph (and Saab) changed water pump impellers to try and alleviate this, but that couldn't solve the problem alone because of the pump being
much higher than the lowest point of the cooling system.
Using a header tank does largely solve the problem, but the header tank needs really to be higher than the engine's highest point
for the low level indicator to be activated BEFORE the coolant level drops in the engine.
From the mid 70s Saabs used header tanks (as indeed did all manufacturers for this reason).
Slant four Dolomites give "normal" temperature readings if the coolant level drops below the temperature sender
(there are warnings about this in the workshop manuals). TR7s were equipped with header tanks....
Unlike water, EWC does not pressurise. This obviously reduces the strain on rubber components such as hoses.
Furthermore it does not corrode the engine's internals or clog the radiator.
For all Dolomites, the correct version to use is Powercool 180, not the classic versions.
The classic versions are not recommended for vehicles without a header or for engines with alloy content.
Ian.
They don't work the same way at all.veloce_rosso wrote: ↑Wed Apr 29, 2020 12:33 pmI presume header tanks work in the same way as water expansion tanks. Sorry, this is where my Dolomite logic hits a brick wall.