Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

For everything to do with Dolomites, Toledos, FWD cars and Dolomite-based kitcars.

Should I have Project NWL's shell dipped?

Yes, damn right you should!
5
42%
No - are you crazy? Just get it media blasted.
7
58%
 
Total votes: 12

Message
Author
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#1 Post by James467 »

As per my thread, Project NWL. Should I get the shell (minus the doors, bootlid and bonnet because they've been media blasted) dipped and e-coated?

I was going to have the body dipped but after speaking to a number of high end restorers, those that specialise in Italian exotica and Astons I have been strongly advised not to. I have been told that it will make the car worth more in the long term, this was by SPL when I spoke them. Personally I don't believe this, what makes the car valuable is the quality of work done during the restoration and the car's provenance, it was then I went to see the paint shop who I want to use. The guy I normally use has retired and recommended someone, I was shown a shell that was dipped and left for 6 months in a dry garage before paint, it had the e-coating or whatever they call it. The majority of the spot welded seams had started to rust. Simply they think that the shell hadn't been neutralised properly and as a result nearly all of the seams had to be cut out and re-done. I know the company used, it wasn't SPL by the way. Apparently they blamed the owner for transporting and leaving the car uncovered.

After seeing that I was thinking a big no but properly done and with a big guarantee I can see the benefits.
User avatar
soe8m
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:13 am
Location: The continent

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#2 Post by soe8m »

Yes i have heard and seen the downside of the dips also. Not properly cleaned and rusting again. But media blasting can't be removed properly. When the sills and other hollow sections had their anti rust smurrie it does stick and keep moisture. My favorite is the the dip but at a trusted company.

Jeroen
Classic Kabelboom Company. For all your wiring needs. http://www.classickabelboomcompany.com
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#3 Post by James467 »

Thanks Jeroen! :thumbsup:

I have to admit that after seeing inside the box sections in the front panels and the black coating there it would be good to replicate it.
User avatar
Toledo Man
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 7542
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:52 pm
Location: Halifax, West Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#4 Post by Toledo Man »

James, both Mike Barker and Mark Gibson have had their Sprints acid dipped and e-coated by SPL. It would be worth seeking their opinions on the process. A third alternative is to have the shell baked in an oven which makes the paint all flaky and easy to scrape off.
Toledo Man

West Yorkshire Area Organiser
Meetings take place on the first Wednesday of the month at 8.00pm at The Railway, 1 Birstall Lane, Drighlington, Bradford, BD11 1JJ

2003 Volvo XC90 D5 SE (PX53 OVZ - The daily driver)
2009 Mercedes-Benz W204 C200 CDI Sport (BJ58 NCV - The 2nd car)
1991 Toyota Celica GT (J481 ONB - a project car)
Former stable of SAY 414M (1974 Toledo), GRH 244D (1966 1300fwd), CDB 324L (1973 1500fwd), GGN 573J (1971 1500fwd), DCP 625S (1977 Dolomite 1300) & LCG 367N (1975 Dolomite Sprint), NYE 751L (1972 Dolomite 1850 auto) plus 5 Acclaims and that's just the Triumphs!

Check my blog at http://triumphtoledo.blogspot.com
My YouTube Channel with a bit of Dolomite content.

"There is only one way to avoid criticsm: Do nothing, say nothing and BE nothing." Aristotle
User avatar
Galileo
TDC Member
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:20 pm
Location: Shetland / here & there

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#5 Post by Galileo »

I've heard plenty of talk for both, seems to be a subject where opinion is split. There are those that say dipping is great, gets into all of the box sections, and others that say the acid doesn't get washed out of the box sections, that it does not penetrate into rusty seams fully. Then I've heard similar about media blasting, doesn't get into hollow sections like pillars, lot's of debris left over. Seems to me that it depends on the quality of the supplier, and maybe even the type of construction.

Media blasting is tried and tested, so would you expect that the older high end restorers will stick with something proven than risk a new process on something worth tens of thousands of pounds or more, which may rust and threaten their reputation?
Current fleet: '75 Sprint, '73 1850, Daihatsu Fourtrak, Honda CG125, Yamaha Fazer 600, Shetland 570 (yes it's a boat!)

Past fleet: Triumph 2000, Lancia Beta Coupe, BL Mini Clubman, Austin Metro, Vauxhall Cavalier MK1 & MK2, Renault 18 D, Rover 216 GSI, Honda Accord (most expensive car purchase, hated, made out of magnetic metal as only car I've ever been crashed into...4 times), BMW 318, Golf GTi MK3 16v x 3
Carledo
TDC Shropshire Area Organiser
Posts: 7250
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:12 pm
Location: Highley, Shropshire

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#6 Post by Carledo »

Steel rusts! It's a fact of life, entropy must increase and all we, or anyone else, can do is fight a gallant losing battle!

Steve
'73 2 door Toledo with Vauxhall Carlton 2.0 8v engine (The Carledo)
'78 Sprint Auto with Vauxhall Omega 2.2 16v engine (The Dolomega)
'72 Triumph 1500FWD in Slate Grey, Now with RWD and Carledo powertrain!

Maverick Triumph, Servicing, Repairs, Electrical, Recomissioning, MOT prep, Trackerjack brake fitting service.
Apprentice served Triumph Specialist for 50 years. PM for more info or quotes.
User avatar
shaunroche
TDC Member
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:49 pm
Location: Northwich

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#7 Post by shaunroche »

It would be worth seeking out the thoughts of PaulB who had his full shell dipped and E-coated (twice!) at Pro-Strip in Nottingham.

I had my doors done there – they came back looking fabulous, but when they were fitted they had been warped by the heat and it took a good few hundred quid to get them sorted out elsewhere, so I don’t think the process is as fool proof as it could be, though a lot depends on the company doing it, and I haven’t heard any good stories about anyone yet.

After speaking with Paul, my car was media blasted and then Dinitrol has been applied to the inside of all the box sections which if the blurb is to believed, should be as good as dipping, but who knows if any of the plethora of Dinitrol, Dynax, Waxoil etc. actually work or not? They all talk a good fight.

When I next restore a car, I doubt I would dip it as I haven’t personally seen conclusive proof it does what it is supposed to do.
Come and see some pretty shoddy, slow driving of a really well prepared competition Sprint here!

http://www.youtube.com/@theunknownworrier

Club Triumph Round Britain Reliability Run 2025 Fund raising page:

https://wonderful.org/fundraisers/n8AYV ... derful.org
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#8 Post by James467 »

I had my doors done there – they came back looking fabulous, but when they were fitted they had been warped by the heat and it took a good few hundred quid to get them sorted out elsewhere,
I wont be having the doors dipped they've gone to Elgamec to be blasted, same people who did the bonnet and boot. Bonnet and boot can't be dipped because they are sealed together (at least that's what I was told) and dipping them would make them fall apart!!

Media blasting is significantly cheaper, even when you take into account protecting the shell and wax injection. But it will need to go on a rotisserie and be rotated to get all of the media out of the various box sections!!

Cost isn't an issue here, doing the best job is.

The other thing is that apart from the front chassis rail and boot floor my car is not that rusty, even looking inside the box sections with a camera probe thing there is some surface rust but you can see the original black dip(?) coating applied at the factory. The underside has surface rust but in most places you can see the black coating where it wasn't even painted (underside will be painted!!)

Steve, you're right, the OCD itch needs scratching but is dipping this shell really that necessary simply because I dont need to get into the box sections?
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#9 Post by James467 »

Actually thinking about it, what box sections are on a Dolomite shell?

Sills - they'll be removed and replaced anyway
Chassis rails - being replaced because they are dented!
Inner wings, front subframe mountings - only the OS is bad and that will be repaired, NS has been inspected and is in excellent condition.
Front Nose - All good, slight surface rust but black coating can be seen.
Front end panels at the top of the wings - inspected and no rust
A Posts - Good, surface rust and small hole on NS
B Posts - No rust
C Post - Rust on OS where water has been trapped between the panel and the vinyl/plastic cover
Roof - No rust, even at rear vents!!
Box section across rear floor - clear, mouse made a home in here last winter!

If there's no or little rust to kill then why dip? It seems unnecessary when I will be injecting dinitrol in all of the box sections regardless of it being dipped or not.
User avatar
soe8m
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 3179
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 1:13 am
Location: The continent

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#10 Post by soe8m »

That is not quite what i did mean. The media like sand you cannot fully get out the box sections as it does stick on earlier rust prevention muck what is sprayed in. You will never get it completely out even if there was no earlier rustprotection it is hard to clean it. This left over is becoming a new moisture trap because it does adhese the moisture. When spraying the new muck in you get a nice mix and when leaking out after spraying the leftover sand mixes with the new anti rust and can clog the way's where normally the water has to go out.

That is the downside of media blasting. It does get everywhere and is hard to take out.

Jeroen
Classic Kabelboom Company. For all your wiring needs. http://www.classickabelboomcompany.com
User avatar
shaunroche
TDC Member
Posts: 1054
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 10:49 pm
Location: Northwich

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#11 Post by shaunroche »

Think you've made a good case for not dipping it then!

I would certainly Dinitrol inside the cavity where the windscreen wiper spindles poke through and then inside the A posts and the chassis box section that run either side of the engine, but then all I've done every cavity I could find including the ones inside the car that aren't especially well known for rusting anyway! Oh and inside the doors and bonnet and bootlid!
Come and see some pretty shoddy, slow driving of a really well prepared competition Sprint here!

http://www.youtube.com/@theunknownworrier

Club Triumph Round Britain Reliability Run 2025 Fund raising page:

https://wonderful.org/fundraisers/n8AYV ... derful.org
User avatar
SprintMWU773V
TDC Staffs Area Organiser
Posts: 5429
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 2:08 pm
Location: The Old Asylum

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#12 Post by SprintMWU773V »

I had mine liberally sprayed with rust proofer when it was painted. Not sure what they used, think it was a VW/Audi product. Either way it got into all the right places. It's an easy job to do yourself albeit smelly and messy. Don't so it without a compressor though, the cans are good but a compressor atomises the product better and it's far better that way. There's no advantage in filling it solid, you want a nice light coating that covers any exposed areas. I've done a couple of MX5's and half a can or so was sufficient for the chassis rails and sills. Top tip is to put the can in warm water to keep soft and then choose a nice warm day to spray.

It is possible to drill additional holes in the car to access the jacking point areas which cannot be reached with the existing holes.
Mark

1961 Chevrolet Corvair Greenbrier Sportswagon
1980 Dolomite Sprint project using brand new shell
2009 Mazda MX5 2.0 Sport
2018 Infiniti Q30
User avatar
Galileo
TDC Member
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2015 8:20 pm
Location: Shetland / here & there

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#13 Post by Galileo »

Thinking about it, if I was to do a bare metal resto, I think I would get it media blasted, probably by the bloke just north of me (Huntingdon) at Easton, and then get it up to the people at Rustbuster just a bit further up in Spalding.

Is that fact or opinion? Probably mostly the latter with a little bit of the former and a dollop of gut instinct...
Current fleet: '75 Sprint, '73 1850, Daihatsu Fourtrak, Honda CG125, Yamaha Fazer 600, Shetland 570 (yes it's a boat!)

Past fleet: Triumph 2000, Lancia Beta Coupe, BL Mini Clubman, Austin Metro, Vauxhall Cavalier MK1 & MK2, Renault 18 D, Rover 216 GSI, Honda Accord (most expensive car purchase, hated, made out of magnetic metal as only car I've ever been crashed into...4 times), BMW 318, Golf GTi MK3 16v x 3
Ron1966
Guest contributor
Guest contributor
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 9:12 pm

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#14 Post by Ron1966 »

I believe James that any original paint you have on your car that has not rusted after the best part of 40 years I personally would leave well alone.
User avatar
James467
TDC Sprint Registrar
Posts: 1938
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:27 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Should I get Project NWL's shell dipped?

#15 Post by James467 »

Thanks everyone for their input!

There is of course Soda Blasting which I am very interested in at the moment. In theory that should get over the problems that Jeroen was talking about with the media getting into the box sections.
Post Reply